Avazian v. Beers et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/22/15 ORDERING that the case remains held in abeyance. The parties shall submit a Status Report on 5/25/2016.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
5 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov 6 Attorneys for Defendants 1 2 3 4 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 GEVORG AVAZIAN, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 v. RAND BEERS, et al., Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 2:13-cv-2589 GEB AC ) ) ) ) ) JOINT STIPULATION AND ) [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ABEYANCE ) ) ) 16 17 18 19 This is an immigration case currently held in abeyance, as plaintiff has been placed into removal proceedings, and the removal proceedings take precedence over plaintiff’s naturalization application. Plaintiff’s next hearing date in immigration court is scheduled for 20 21 March 3, 2016. Accordingly, the parties agree to extend the time for filing the status report to 22 May 25, 2016. The parties request that the status conference, currently set for June 22, 2015, be 23 reset to sometime after May 25, 2016. The pretrial scheduling conference is rescheduled for 24 June 27, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be filed fourteen days prior to the hearing. 25 26 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dated: May 21, 2015 Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 7 8 s/ Audrey B. Hemesath AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 9 10 s/ Douglas Lehrman DOUGLAS LEHRMAN Attorney for the Plaintiff 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER For the foregoing reasons, the case remains held in abeyance. The parties shall submit a 19 status report on May 25, 2016. 20 21 Dated: May 22, 2015 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?