Avazian v. Beers et al
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/22/15 ORDERING that the case remains held in abeyance. The parties shall submit a Status Report on 5/25/2016.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov
6
Attorneys for Defendants
1
2
3
4
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
GEVORG AVAZIAN,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
v.
RAND BEERS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
) Case No.: 2:13-cv-2589 GEB AC
)
)
)
)
) JOINT STIPULATION AND
) [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ABEYANCE
)
)
)
16
17
18
19
This is an immigration case currently held in abeyance, as plaintiff has been placed into
removal proceedings, and the removal proceedings take precedence over plaintiff’s
naturalization application. Plaintiff’s next hearing date in immigration court is scheduled for
20
21
March 3, 2016. Accordingly, the parties agree to extend the time for filing the status report to
22
May 25, 2016. The parties request that the status conference, currently set for June 22, 2015, be
23
reset to sometime after May 25, 2016. The pretrial scheduling conference is rescheduled for
24
June 27, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be filed fourteen days prior to the hearing.
25
26
27
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Dated: May 21, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
7
8
s/ Audrey B. Hemesath
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
9
10
s/ Douglas Lehrman
DOUGLAS LEHRMAN
Attorney for the Plaintiff
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER
For the foregoing reasons, the case remains held in abeyance. The parties shall submit a
19
status report on May 25, 2016.
20
21
Dated: May 22, 2015
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?