Avazian v. Beers et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER RE: ABEYANCE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/11/17. The parties shall submit a Status Report on 9/11/2018.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 Douglas Lehrman Attorney for Respondent 2 Law Offices of Douglas Lehrman 2400 22nd Street, #110 3 Sacramento, CA 95818 4 Telephone: (916) 442-5900 Email: dmlmail@sbcglobal.net 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUNT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ____________________________________ ) 10 GEVORG AVAZIAN, ) ) 11 Plaintiff ) ) 12 v. ) ) 13 RAND BEERS, et al., ) 14 ) Defendants ) 15 ____________________________________) 16 17 Case No.: 2:13-cv-2589-KJM-AC JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ABEYANCE This is an immigration case currently held in abeyance, as plaintiff has been placed into removal 18 proceedings, and the removal proceedings take precedence over plaintiff’s naturalization application. 19 20 The joint status report is currently due on October 23, 2017, however the Plaintiff’s next hearing date in immigration court is not until August 24, 2018. Accordingly, the parties agree to extended the time for 21 22 23 filing the joint status report and request the deadline be extended until after the Immigration hearing takes place. The 24 25 26 Dated: August 25, 2017 Respectfully submitted: 27 28 1 /s/ Douglas Lehrman Douglas Lehrman Attorney at Law 1 2 3 Benjamin B. Wagner United States Attorney 4 5 6 /s/ Audrey B. Hemesath (as authorized on August 25, 2017) Audrey B. Hemesath Assistant United States Attorney 7 8 9 10 ORDER 11 12 For the foregoing reasons, the case remains held in abeyance. The parties shall submit a status 13 report on September 11, 2018. 14 Dated: September 11, 2017. 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?