Khan v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
Filing
7
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/6/14 RECOMMENDING that this Action be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction re 1 Complaint. These Findings and Recommendation are submitted to U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to these F&R due within fourteen days.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KHALID KHAN,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:13-cv-2596 KJM CKD PS
Plaintiff,
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. In the complaint, plaintiff complains about an
19
allegedly wrongful foreclosure. Plaintiff alleges only state law claims. The complaint does not
20
allege a basis for subject matter jurisdiction in this court. The federal courts are courts of limited
21
jurisdiction. In the absence of a basis for federal jurisdiction, plaintiff’s claims cannot proceed in
22
this venue. Because there is no basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction evident in the
23
complaint, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Plaintiff
24
has filed a response in which he alleges jurisdiction is proper under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Upon
25
review of plaintiff’s response to the order to show cause, it appears this court lacks subject matter
26
jurisdiction under both 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question) and 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (diversity).
27
To the extent plaintiff alleges federal question jurisdiction is proper because plaintiff
28
pleads a violation of his civil rights, such a claim cannot lie in that defendants do not appear to be
1
1
state actors. The Civil Rights Act provides as follows:
2
4
Every person who, under color of [state law] . . . subjects, or
causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States . . . to the
deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution . . . shall be liable to the party injured in an action at
law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.
5
42 U.S.C. § 1983. To state a claim under section 1983, a plaintiff must allege that: (1) defendant
6
was acting under color of state law at the time the complained of act was committed; and (2)
7
defendant’s conduct deprived plaintiff of rights, privileges or immunities secured by the
8
Constitution or laws of the United States. 42 U.S.C. § 1983; see West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48
9
(1988). Here, plaintiff alleges that the defendants are banking associations and their subsidiaries
3
10
which wrongfully foreclosed on plaintiff’s property. There is no allegation of conduct by any
11
defendant that can be fairly characterized as state action.
12
With respect to diversity jurisdiction, plaintiff alleges defendant U.S. Bank N.A. has its
13
principal place of business in the State of California. Plaintiff is a resident of the State of
14
California. Under these circumstances, diversity jurisdiction is lacking.
15
From the allegations of the complaint, the court cannot discern any proper basis for
16
subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has been afforded an opportunity to show this court has
17
subject matter jurisdiction and has failed to establish a proper basis.
18
19
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction.
20
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
21
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
22
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
23
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
24
////
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
2
1
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections
2
within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.
3
Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
4
Dated: January 6, 2014
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
4 khan-usbank2596.nosmj.57
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?