Liu v. J's Garden Restaurant, Inc. et al
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/2/14: The Parties are ordered to file a joint written statement regarding whether this matter was resolved at mediation on or before May 20, 2014. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Randal M. Barnum State Bar No. 111287
Carrie E. Croxall
State Bar No. 190430
LAW OFFICES OF RANDAL M. BARNUM
279 East H Street
Benicia, CA 94510
Telephone:
707.745.3747
Facsimile:
707.745.4580
rbarnum@rmblaw.com
ccroxall@rmblaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants, J’s Garden Restaurant, Inc.,
Jenn Wah Jang and James Jang
7
8
9
10
Mark J. Bluer
State Bar No. 157071
BLUER & BLUER, LLP
222 Sutter Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone:
415-989-1281
Facsimile:
415-358-4306
mbluer@bluerlaw.com
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff Jisheng Liu
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
JISHENG LIU,
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
CASE NO. 2:13-cv-02615-KJN
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE
MEDIATION
v.
J’s GARDEN RESTAURANT, INC.; JENN
WAH JANG; JAMES JANG; and DOES 125,
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
Plaintiff Jisheng Liu and Defendants J’s Garden Restaurant, Inc., Jenn Wah Jang, and
25
James Jang, collectively “the Parties”, by and through their counsel, stipulate and agree as
26
follows:
27
1.
28
///
WHEREAS, this action was filed on December 3, 2013.
-1STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION
2.
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges six causes of action: (1) Violation of
2
the Fair Labor Standards Act [29 U.S.C. § 201 et. seq.]; (2) Failure to Pay Overtime
3
Compensation (at time and one-half) [Cal. Labor Code § 510, IWC Order 5-2001]; (3) Failure to
4
Provide Itemized Statements of Earnings [Cal. Labor Code § 226(e)]; (4) Waiting Time Penalties
5
[Cal. Labor Code § 203]; (5) Rest Period Violations [Cal. Labor Code § 276.7]; and (6)
6
Restitution for Unpaid Wages – Violation of California Unfair Practices Act [Bus. & Prof. Code
7
§ 17203].
8
3.
WHEREAS on February 13, 2014, the Court issued an Order approving the
9
Parties’ stipulation for referral of the action to the court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution
10
Program. In the Order, the Court ordered that the Parties file a joint written statement regarding
11
whether this matter was resolved at mediation within 90 days of the February 13, 2014 Order.
12
Thus, the last date on which the Parties may file the joint written statement regarding the
13
outcome of mediation is May 13, 2014.
4.
14
WHEREAS, the Parties believe that it would not be productive to engage in
15
mediation until after certain depositions have been completed. The deposition of Plaintiff is
16
scheduled for April 8, 2014. The depositions of Defendant Jenn Wah Jang and the Person Most
17
Qualified for Defendant J’s Garden Restaurant, Inc. are scheduled for April 28, 2014.
5.
18
19
WHEREAS, the mediation in this matter has been scheduled for May 13, 2014 at
10:00 a.m. with Scott Plamondon, Esq.
20
THEREFORE, all Parties hereto stipulate and agree, and therefore request, that the Court
21
enter an Order continuing the deadline to file a joint statement regarding whether this matter was
22
resolved at mediation to May 20, 2014.
23
24 Dated: April 1, 2014
BLUER & BLUER, LLP
25
By:
26
27
/s/ Mark J. Bluer
Mark J. Bluer
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JISHENG LIU
28 / / /
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION
1 Dated: April 1, 2014
LAW OFFICES OF RANDAL M. BARNUM
2
By:
3
4
5
/s/ Randal M. Barnum
Randal M. Barnum
Carrie E. Croxall
Attorneys for Defendants
J’S GARDEN RESTAURANT, INC.;
JENN WAH JANG; and JAMES JANG
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
The Parties are ordered to file a joint written statement regarding whether this matter was
9
10
resolved at mediation on or before May 20, 2014.
Dated: April 2, 2014
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?