Liu v. J's Garden Restaurant, Inc. et al
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/17/2014 ORDERING that within 28 days of this order, the parties shall meet and confer about the mandatory disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, if they have not already done so. A status (pre-trial scheduling) conference is set for Thursday 3/20/2014, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25 before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference, the parties shall file a joint status report. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JISHENG LIU,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:13-cv-2615 KJN
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
J’S GARDEN RESTAURANT, INC. et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On December 17, 2013, defendants filed a notice of removal removing this action from
18
the Solano County Superior Court. (ECF No. 1.) The notice of removal invoked the court’s
19
federal question subject matter jurisdiction. (Id.) According to the notice of removal and case
20
documents accompanying the notice of removal, the action was filed in state court on December
21
3, 2013; defendants were personally served with the complaint on December 8, 2013; and
22
defendants filed an answer to the complaint in state court on December 17, 2013. (Id.)
23
After all parties consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all
24
purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (ECF Nos. 4, 6), the action was reassigned to the
25
undersigned for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment.
26
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and E.D. Cal. L.R. 240, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. Within 28 days of this order, the parties shall meet and confer about the mandatory
28
disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, if they have not already done so.
1
1
2. A status (pre-trial scheduling) conference is set for Thursday March 20, 2014, at 10:00
2
a.m., in Courtroom No. 25 before the undersigned. All parties shall appear by counsel
3
or in person if acting without counsel.
4
3. Not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference, the parties shall file a
5
joint status report briefly describing the case and addressing the following: (a) service
6
of process; (b) possible joinder of additional parties; (c) any expected or desired
7
amendment of the pleadings; (d) jurisdiction and venue; (e) anticipated motions and
8
their scheduling; (f) the report required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 outlining the proposed
9
discovery plan and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert witnesses; (g) future
10
proceedings, including setting appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and law and
11
motion, and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial; (h) special procedures, if
12
any; (i) estimated trial time; (j) modifications of standard pretrial procedures due to the
13
simplicity or complexity of the proceedings; (k) whether the case is related to any
14
other cases, including bankruptcy; (l) whether a settlement conference should be
15
scheduled, including whether the parties desire an early settlement conference; (m)
16
whether counsel will stipulate to the undersigned acting as settlement judge and waive
17
disqualification by virtue of his so acting, or whether they would prefer to have a
18
settlement conference conducted before another judge; (n) whether the case should be
19
briefly stayed and referred to the court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program
20
(“VDRP”); and (o) any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious
21
disposition of this matter.
22
4. Failure to obey the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this court’s Local Rules, or an
23
order of this court may result in dismissal of the action or other appropriate sanctions.
24
5. Counsel are reminded of their continuing duty to notify chambers immediately of any
25
settlement or other disposition. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 160. In addition, the parties are
26
cautioned that pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c), opposition to granting of a motion
27
must be filed fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further
28
provides that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral
2
1
arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.”
2
Moreover, E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(i) provides that failure to appear may be deemed
3
withdrawal of the motion or of opposition to the motion, or may result in sanctions.
4
Finally, E.D. Cal. L.R. 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules or
5
with any order of the court “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions
6
authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 17, 2014
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?