Thermogenesis Corp. v. Origen Biomedical, Inc.

Filing 98

STIPULATION and ORDER 97 for Dismissal signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/15/2015. This action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Both parties shall bear their own costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over any actions concerning enforcement of parties' Confidential Settlement and Release Agreement related to this action. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4

THOMAS A. WOODS (SB #210050)
STOEL RIVES LLP
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendant
ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC.
ANDREA M. MILLER (SB #88992)
NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC.
8801 Folsom Blvd., Suite 172
Sacramento, CA 95826
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
THERMOGENESIS GROUP

14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

THERMOGENESIS CORP.,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20

vs.
ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC.,
Defendant.

Case No.: 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD
JOINT STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY
DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.
41(a)(1)(A)(ii) AND DISTRICT COURT
CONTINUING JURISDICTION OVER
ENFORCEMENT; ORDER THEREON

21
22

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that:

23

Plaintiff THERMOGENESIS CORP. (“Thermo”) and Defendant ORIGEN

24

BIOMEDICAL, INC. (“OriGen”), collectively, “the Parties,” respectfully submit this Joint

25

Stipulation to voluntarily dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

26

41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

27
28

Whereas, on December 17, 2013, Plaintiff filed this action in the United District
Court for the Eastern District of California.
-1–
Joint Stipulation To Voluntarily Dismiss Action With Prejudice Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
And District Court Continuing Jurisdiction Over Enforcement - Case No.: 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD

1

Whereas, the District Court shall retain limited, continuing jurisdiction over

2

disputes relating to the enforcement of the provisions of the Parties’ Confidential

3

Settlement and Release Agreement related to this action pursuant to Kokkonen v.

4

Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994).

5

Whereas, the Parties have fully resolved this matter via a Confidential Settlement

6

agreement and release of all claims and agree to the dismissal of the action with

7

prejudice, with both Parties to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees, and with the

8

Court retaining continuing jurisdiction over disputes relating to the enforcement of the

9

provisions of the Parties’ Confidential Settlement and Release Agreement in this matter.

10

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

11
12

DATED: April 14, 2015

STOEL RIVES LLP

13
/s/ Thomas A. Woods
By____________________________
THOMAS A. WOODS
Attorneys for Defendant
ORIGEN BIOMEDICAL, INC.

14
15
16
17
18

DATED: April 14, 2015

NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC.
/s/ Andrea M. Miller
By_____________________________
ANDREA M. MILLER
Attorneys for Plaintiff
THERMOGENESIS CORP.

19
20
21
22

ORDER

23
24
25
26
27
28

On review of the Parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal and for good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

The above-captioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice with both

Parties to bear their own costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, and,
2.

This Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over any actions concerning

-2–
Joint Stipulation To Voluntarily Dismiss Action With Prejudice Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
And District Court Continuing Jurisdiction Over Enforcement - Case No.: 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD

1

the enforcement of the provisions of the Parties’ Confidential Settlement and Release

2

Agreement related to this action. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511

3

U.S. 375 (1994).

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 15, 2015

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3–
Joint Stipulation To Voluntarily Dismiss Action With Prejudice Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
And District Court Continuing Jurisdiction Over Enforcement - Case No.: 2:13-cv-02619-MCE-DAD