Gibbs v. California Department of Fish and Game et al

Filing 71

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/26/2016 ADOPTING IN FULL 62 Findings and Recommedations; DENYING 59 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT ALAN GIBBS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:13-CV-2631-KJM-CMK

v.

ORDER

BOYD, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. The matter was

17
18

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Eastern District of California local rules.
On August 10, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations,

19
20

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections

21

within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

22

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United

23

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

24

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

25

1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

26

supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The findings and recommendations filed August 10, 2016, are adopted in

4

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 59) is denied.

5

DATED: September 26, 2016.

3

full; and

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2