Kouretas v. Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, Inc. et al
Filing
38
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/13/2014 ORDERING the 33 & 35 Motions to Dismiss CONTINUED TO 6/12/2014 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Joint status report due 6/27/2014. Initial disclosures due 7/10/2014. (Donati, J)
1 Molly Taylor Zapala (SBN 245985)
Email:
mzapala@reedsmith.com
2 Jamie D. Wells (SBN 290827)
Email:
jwells@reedsmith.com
3 REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street
4 Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
5 Telephone: +1 415 543 8700
Facsimile: +1 415 391 8269
6
Attorneys for Defendant
7 Bank of America, N.A.
8
REED SMITH LLP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12 James Kouretas, an individual,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
15 Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, Inc., Bank of
American, N.A.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:13-CV-02632-MCE-KJN
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE JOINT
STATUS REPORT DEADLINE AND
MOTION TO DISMISS HEARING AND
ORDER
Compl. Filed: December 20, 2013
Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr.
STIPULATION
1
2
Plaintiff James Kouretas (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) and
3 Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (“Nationstar”) (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their
4 respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows:
5
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his Complaint in this Court against Defendants on December 20,
6 2013;
7
WHEREAS, BANA filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint on January 13, 2014;
8
WHEREAS, Nationstar filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint on January 14,
9 2014;
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
WHEREAS, on March 12, 2014, this Court granted BANA’s Motion to Dismiss with twenty
11 (20) days leave to amend from the date of the Court’s Memorandum and Order;
12
WHEREAS, on March 12, 2014, this Court granted Nationstar’s Motion to Dismiss with
13 twenty (20) days leave to amend from the date of the Court’s Memorandum and Order;
14
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2014, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint;
15
WHEREAS, on April 23, 2014, BANA filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First
16 Amended Complaint, and the Motion to Dismiss hearing is scheduled for May 29, 2014;
17
WHEREAS, on April 23, 2014, Nationstar filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First
18 Amended Complaint, and the Motion to Dismiss hearing is scheduled for May 29, 2014;
19
WHEREAS, due to scheduling issues, the parties respectfully request that the Motion to
20 Dismiss hearing be continued;
21
WHEREAS, the parties have until May 27, 2014 to confer as required by Federal Rule of
22 Civil Procedure 26(f);
23
WHEREAS, the parties have until May 27, 2014 to file a joint status report;
24
WHEREAS, the parties have until June 10, 2014 to file initial disclosures;
25
WHEREAS, the case is not at issue, the parties respectfully request that the deadline for the
26 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) Conference be continued;
27
WHEREAS, the case is not at issue, the parties respectfully request that the deadline for
28 filing the joint status report be continued;
–1–
1
WHEREAS, the case is not at issue, the parties respectfully request that the deadline for
2 filing initial disclosures be continued;
3
WHEREAS, the parties agree that in the interest of judicial efficiency, since the case is not
4 at issue, that the deadline for the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) Conference, the deadline to
5 file a joint status report, and the deadline to file initial disclosures should be continued.
6
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:
7
BANA’s Motion to Dismiss shall be continued until June 12, 2014;
8
Nationstar’s Motion to Dismiss shall be continued until June 12, 2014;
9
The deadline for the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) Conference in this matter shall be
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10 continued to June 27, 2014, or such later date as the Court may determine.
11
The deadline to file a joint status report in this matter shall be continued to June 27, 2014, or
12 such later date as the Court may determine.
13
The deadline to file initial disclosures in this matter shall be continued to July 10, 2014, or
14 such later date as the Court may determine.
15
16
Dated: May 5, 2014
REED SMITH LLP
17
18
By /s/ Jamie D. Wells
Jamie D. Wells, Esq. (SBN 290827)
Attorneys for Defendant
Bank of America, N.A.
19
20
21
22
23
Dated: May 5, 2014
SEVERSON & WERSON LLP
24
25
26
By /s/ Megan Kelly
Megan Kelly, Esq. (SBN 251293)
Attorneys for Defendant
Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, Inc.
27
28
–2–
1 Dated: May 5, 2014
LAW OFFICES OF ALDON L. BOLANOS, ESQ
2
3
4
5
By /s/ Aldon L. Bolanos
Aldon L. Bolanos, Esq. (SBN 233915)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
James Kouretas
6
7
8
9
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–3–
ORDER
1
2
Based on the above Stipulation of Plaintiff James Kouretas (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants
3 Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) and Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (Nationstar) (collectively
4 “Defendants”), this Court hereby orders:
5
BANA’s Motion to Dismiss shall be continued until June 12, 2014;
6
Nationstar’s Motion to Dismiss shall be continued until June 12, 2014;
7
The deadline for the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) Conference in this matter shall be continued to
8 June 27, 2014.
9
The deadline to file a joint status report in this matter shall be continued to June 27, 2014.
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
The deadline to file initial disclosures in this matter shall be continued to July 10, 2014.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12 Dated: May 13, 2014
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–4–
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?