McDaniel v. Powell, et al.

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/4/14 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Service is appropriate for defendants Daniel Powell, John Vilnau and the City of Davis Police Department. The Clerk shall send plaintiff 3 USM forms, 1 s ummons, a copy of the complaint, consent form and the court's status order. Plaintiff is directed to submit service documents to the USM, and a statement with the court that documents have been submitted within 15 days. The USM shall serve process within 90 days. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TANYA MCDANIEL, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-2653 MCE AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER DANIEL POWELL, ET AL., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action without counsel and has requested leave to proceed in 18 forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant 19 to Local Rule 302(a). 20 21 22 Plaintiff has submitted an affidavit making the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. The determination that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the 23 required inquiry. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the court is directed to dismiss the case at 24 any time if it determines the allegation of poverty is untrue, or the action is frivolous or malicious, 25 fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune 26 defendant. The court cannot make this determination on the present record. Therefore, the court 27 reserves decision on these issues until the record is sufficiently developed. 28 1 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is granted. 3 2. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: Daniel Powell, John Vilnau, and 4 the City of Davis Police Department. 5 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith, and the U.S. Marshal is directed 6 to serve within ninety days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 7 Procedure 4, including a copy of this court’s status order, without prepayment of costs. 8 4. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form for each defendant, one 9 summons, a copy of the complaint, an appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge, 10 and this court’s status order. 11 5. Plaintiff is directed to supply the U.S. Marshal, within 15 days from the date this order 12 is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall file a 13 statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. 14 The court anticipates that, to effect service, the U.S. Marshal will require at least: 15 a. One completed summons for each defendant; 16 b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant; 17 c. One copy of the endorsed filed complaint for each defendant, with an extra 18 copy for the U.S. Marshal; 19 d. One copy of this court’s status order for each defendant; and 20 e. One copy of the instant order for each defendant. 21 6. In the event the U.S. Marshal is unable, for any reason whatsoever, to effectuate 22 service on any defendant within 90 days from the date of this order, the Marshal is directed to 23 report that fact, and the reasons for it, to the undersigned. 24 7. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal, 25 501 “I” Street, Sacramento, Ca., 95814, Tel. No. (916) 930-2030. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 2 1 8. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be 2 dismissed. 3 DATED: March 4, 2014 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?