Pharmacy Providers of Oklahoma, Inc v. Q Pharmacy, Inc., et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/26/13: Plaintiff shall file any opposition to Q Pharmacy's motion to quash no later than March 29, 2013, at 12:00 p.m. In the alternative, the parties may file a stipulation to stay production by McKesson in response to the subpoena pending a ruling on the motion to stay discovery in the Western District of Oklahoma. After reviewing the parties' briefing, the court will set the motion for a hearing if necessary. The parties shall promptly notify the court if the motion to quash is mooted by any proceedings in the Western District of Oklahoma. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHARMACY PROVIDERS OF OKLAHOMA, INC., 11 Plaintiff, No. 2:13-mc-0027 LKK KJN 12 v. 13 Q PHARMACY, INC., et al. 14 Defendants. 15 16 ORDER / Presently pending before the court is defendant Q Pharmacy, Inc.’s (“Q 17 Pharmacy”) motion to quash plaintiff Pharmacy Providers of Oklahoma, Inc.’s (“plaintiff”) third- 18 party subpoena on McKesson Corporation, filed in this court on March 25, 2013. (Dkt. No. 1.) 19 The motion has not been noticed for any specific hearing date. According to Q Pharmacy, the 20 subpoena at issue arises from plaintiff’s lawsuit against Q Pharmacy and other defendants in the 21 Western District of Oklahoma, where motions to dismiss, and a motion to stay discovery pending 22 resolution of the motions to dismiss and the conduct of a Rule 26(f) conference, remain pending. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff shall file any opposition to Q Pharmacy’s motion to quash no later 25 than March 29, 2013, at 12:00 p.m. In the alternative, the parties may file a stipulation to stay 26 production by McKesson in response to the subpoena pending a ruling on the motion to stay 1 1 discovery in the Western District of Oklahoma. 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, the court will set the motion for a hearing if necessary. 3. The parties shall promptly notify the court if the motion to quash is mooted by any proceedings in the Western District of Oklahoma. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 26, 2013 8 9 10 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?