United States of America v. Approximately $44,251.43 in U.S. Currency seized from Bank of America Account Number 000905941180, held in the name Armando Flores Vasquez et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/30/2015 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture is EXTENDED to 4/3/2015. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U. S. Attorney 3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 4 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 5 Attorneys for the United States 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 2:13-MC-00107-TLN-CKD v. 14 15 16 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE APPROXIMATELY $34,251.43 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER 000905941180, HELD IN THE NAME ARMANDO FLORES VASQUEZ, and 19 APPROXIMATELY $2,043.62 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER 000905548374, HELD IN THE NAME ARMANDO FLORES VASQUEZ, 20 Defendants. 18 21 22 It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and claimant Armando 23 Flores Vasquez (“claimant”), by and through their respective counsel, as follows: 24 1. On or about July 15, 2013, claimant Armando Flores Vasquez filed a claim, in the 25 administrative forfeiture proceedings, with the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the 26 Approximately $34,251.43 in U.S. Currency seized from Bank of America Account Number 27 000905941180 and the Approximately $2,043.62 in U.S. Currency seized from Bank of America 28 29 30 1 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Complaint 1 Account Number 000905548374 (hereafter “defendant funds”), which were seized on May 6, 2013. 2 2. The Internal Revenue Service has sent the written notice of intent to forfeit required by 3 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties. The time has expired for any person to file a 4 claim to the defendant funds under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person other than the claimant 5 has filed a claim to the defendant funds as required by law in the administrative forfeiture proceeding. 6 3. Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for 7 forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds 8 are subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative forfeiture 9 proceedings, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of the parties. 10 That deadline was October 11, 2013. 11 4. By Stipulation and Order filed October 8, 2013, the parties stipulated to extend to 12 January 9, 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture 13 against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject 14 to forfeiture. 15 5. By Stipulation and Order filed January 9, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to April 16 9, 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against 17 the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to 18 forfeiture. 19 6. By Stipulation and Order filed April 11, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to July 8, 20 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the 21 defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to 22 forfeiture. 23 7. By Stipulation and Order filed July 7, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to October 6, 24 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the 25 defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to 26 forfeiture. 27 8. By Stipulation and Order filed October 3, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to 28 December 5, 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture 2 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File 29 Complaint 30 1 against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject 2 to forfeiture. 9. 3 By Stipulation and Order filed December 8, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to 4 February 3, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture 5 against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject 6 to forfeiture. 10. 7 As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement for an extension 8 to April 3, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture 9 against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject 10 to forfeiture. 11. 11 Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be 12 required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment 13 alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to April 3, 2015. 14 Dated: 1/23/15 15 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ Kevin C. Khasigian KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 16 17 18 20 /s/ William A. Harrison WILLIAM A. HARRISON Attorney for Claimant Armando Flores Vasquez 21 (As authorized via email) 19 Dated: 1/23/15 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: January 30, 2015 25 26 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 27 28 29 30 3 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Complaint

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?