Klaich v. Thomason Law Center, A Professional Law Corporation

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/6/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' proposed briefing schedule concerning whether this putative class action should be certified as a class action is adopted as follows: The motion for class certif ication shall be filed no later than 2/2/2015. A further Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is scheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on 5/18/2015. A joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 Elias Klaich, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 9 10 11 12 Plaintiffs, No. 2:14-cv-00007-GEB-AC ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE v. Thomason Law Center, A Professional Law Corporation dba Client Services Advo, 13 Defendant. 14 15 The status (pretrial scheduling) conference scheduled 16 for hearing on August 18, 2014, is vacated since Plaintiffs’ 17 Status Report filed August 5, 2014, indicates the following Order 18 should issue. 19 20 MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION Plaintiffs’ proposed briefing schedule concerning 21 whether this putative class action should be certified as a class 22 action is adopted as follows: The motion for class certification 23 shall be filed no later than February 2, 2015, which shall be 24 noticed for hearing on the earliest available regularly scheduled 25 law and motion hearing date. 26 SCHEDULING FURTHER STATUS REPORT 27 A further Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is 28 scheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on May 18, 2015. A joint 1 1 status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days 2 prior to the status conference. 3 Dated: August 6, 2014 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?