Klaich v. Thomason Law Center, A Professional Law Corporation
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/6/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' proposed briefing schedule concerning whether this putative class action should be certified as a class action is adopted as follows: The motion for class certif ication shall be filed no later than 2/2/2015. A further Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is scheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on 5/18/2015. A joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
Elias Klaich, individually
and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
9
10
11
12
Plaintiffs,
No. 2:14-cv-00007-GEB-AC
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS
(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE
v.
Thomason Law Center, A
Professional Law Corporation
dba Client Services Advo,
13
Defendant.
14
15
The status (pretrial scheduling) conference scheduled
16
for hearing on August 18, 2014, is vacated since Plaintiffs’
17
Status Report filed August 5, 2014, indicates the following Order
18
should issue.
19
20
MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
Plaintiffs’
proposed
briefing
schedule
concerning
21
whether this putative class action should be certified as a class
22
action is adopted as follows: The motion for class certification
23
shall be filed no later than February 2, 2015, which shall be
24
noticed for hearing on the earliest available regularly scheduled
25
law and motion hearing date.
26
SCHEDULING FURTHER STATUS REPORT
27
A further Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is
28
scheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on May 18, 2015. A joint
1
1
status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days
2
prior to the status conference.
3
Dated:
August 6, 2014
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?