Anderson v. McIntrny, et al.
Filing
62
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/24/15 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ARTHUR ANDERSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0011 MCE CKD P
v.
ORDER
McINTRNY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On May 19, 2015, this court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the First Amended
17
18
Complaint on the ground that plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies was clear on
19
the face of the complaint. (ECF No. 56.) However, the court granted plaintiff thirty days’ leave
20
to file an amended complaint “that complies with the exhaustion requirement or explains why
21
exhaustion was ‘effectively unavailable.’” (Id. at 3.)
22
On June 22, 2015, plaintiff filed a belated opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss.
23
(ECF No. 57.) On the same day, he filed a document titled “Amended and Supplement 832.5
24
Complaint to Original Complaint.” (ECF No. 58.) It alleges continuing wrongdoing by prison
25
staff and does not address the issue of exhaustion. (Id.) Defendant has filed an opposition
26
arguing that neither of these filings comply with the court’s May 19, 2015 order, as plaintiff has
27
shown neither exhaustion nor good cause for failing to exhaust. (ECF No. 61.)
28
////
1
1
2
3
4
The undersigned agrees that plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint that complies
with its earlier order and thus will recommend dismissal of this action.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
5
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
6
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
7
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
8
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
9
and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
10
time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
11
(9th Cir. 1991).
12
Dated: August 24, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
2 / ande011.fta
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?