Stockton v. UniFirst Corporation et al
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/22/15: All of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant shall be dismissed with prejudice, without costs or fees awarded to either party, pursuant to JAMS' final award. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MARY E. WRIGHT, State Bar No. 142886
mary.wright@ogletreedeakins.com
ANDREA L. FELLION, State Bar No. 262278
andrea.fellion@ogletreedeakins.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870
Attorneys for Defendants
UNIFIRST CORPORATION and JERRY SATTERFIELD
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
MICHELLE STOCKTON,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
Case No. 2:14-CV-00016-JAM-DAD
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
v.
UNIFIRST CORPORATION, a corporation,
BERT BLONDIN an individual, JERRY
SATTERFIELD an individual, and DOES 1100, inclusive,
Complaint Filed: November 5, 2013
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:14-CV-00016-JAM-DAD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION
1
2
TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Michelle Stockton (“Stockton”) and Defendant
3
UniFirst Corporation (“UniFirst”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby submit this
4
stipulation and proposed order to dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of
5
Civil Procedure § 41(a).
6
7
STIPULATION
WHEREAS Parties agreed to arbitrate this matter before JAMS pursuant to their
8 Arbitration Agreement;
9
WHEREAS JAMS Granted UniFirst’s Motion to Dismiss, the order for which is attached as
10 Exhibit A, and Denied UniFirst’s Motion for Fees and Costs, the order for which is attached as
11 Exhibit B;
12
NOW, THEREFORE, Stockton and UniFirst hereby stipulate that all of Plaintiff’s claims
13 against Defendant in the above-captioned matter be dismissed with prejudice, without costs or fees
14 awarded to either party, pursuant to JAMS’ final award.
15 DATED: May 22, 2015
16
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
By:
/s/ Andrea Fellion
Mary E. Wright
Andrea L. Fellion
Attorneys for Defendants
UNIFIRST CORPORATION
17
18
19
20
21
DATED: May 22, 2015
THYBERGLAW
By:
/s/ Greg Thyberg (as authorized on May 22, 2015)
Gregory A. Thyberg
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Michelle Stockton
22
23
24
25 IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: 5/22/2015
/s/ John A. Mendez
Hon. John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
1
Case No. 2:14-CV-00016-JAM-DAD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?