Stockton v. UniFirst Corporation et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/22/15: All of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant shall be dismissed with prejudice, without costs or fees awarded to either party, pursuant to JAMS' final award. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MARY E. WRIGHT, State Bar No. 142886 mary.wright@ogletreedeakins.com ANDREA L. FELLION, State Bar No. 262278 andrea.fellion@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.442.4810 Facsimile: 415.442.4870 Attorneys for Defendants UNIFIRST CORPORATION and JERRY SATTERFIELD 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 MICHELLE STOCKTON, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 Case No. 2:14-CV-00016-JAM-DAD STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE v. UNIFIRST CORPORATION, a corporation, BERT BLONDIN an individual, JERRY SATTERFIELD an individual, and DOES 1100, inclusive, Complaint Filed: November 5, 2013 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:14-CV-00016-JAM-DAD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION 1 2 TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Michelle Stockton (“Stockton”) and Defendant 3 UniFirst Corporation (“UniFirst”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby submit this 4 stipulation and proposed order to dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of 5 Civil Procedure § 41(a). 6 7 STIPULATION WHEREAS Parties agreed to arbitrate this matter before JAMS pursuant to their 8 Arbitration Agreement; 9 WHEREAS JAMS Granted UniFirst’s Motion to Dismiss, the order for which is attached as 10 Exhibit A, and Denied UniFirst’s Motion for Fees and Costs, the order for which is attached as 11 Exhibit B; 12 NOW, THEREFORE, Stockton and UniFirst hereby stipulate that all of Plaintiff’s claims 13 against Defendant in the above-captioned matter be dismissed with prejudice, without costs or fees 14 awarded to either party, pursuant to JAMS’ final award. 15 DATED: May 22, 2015 16 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. By: /s/ Andrea Fellion Mary E. Wright Andrea L. Fellion Attorneys for Defendants UNIFIRST CORPORATION 17 18 19 20 21 DATED: May 22, 2015 THYBERGLAW By: /s/ Greg Thyberg (as authorized on May 22, 2015) Gregory A. Thyberg Attorneys for Plaintiff Michelle Stockton 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: 5/22/2015 /s/ John A. Mendez Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 1 Case No. 2:14-CV-00016-JAM-DAD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?