Williams v. Hamad, et al.

Filing 15

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/25/2014 ADOPTING IN FULL 13 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 9 Motion to Proceed IFP; REMINDING the plaintiff that a failure to pay the filing fee will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LONNIE WILLIAMS, 12 No. 2:14-cv-0044 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 HAMAD, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 27, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 27, 2014, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 9) is denied; plaintiff 4 shall pay the filing fee within 28 days of the date of this order. Failure to pay the filing fee will 5 result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. 6 Dated: April 25, 2014 7 8 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 /will0044.804 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?