Williams v. Hamad, et al.

Filing 22

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/17/2014 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days.(Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LONNIE WILLIAMS,

12

No. 2:14-cv-0044 TLN KJN P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

HAMAD, et al.,

15

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant

18

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 20, 2014, the court granted plaintiff twenty-one days to pay the

19

filing fee. (ECF N0. 21.) In this order, the court warned plaintiff that failure to pay the filing fee

20

would result in dismissal of this action. (Id.) Twenty-one days passed and plaintiff failed to pay

21

the filing fee or otherwise respond to the August 20, 2014 order.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed.

23

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

24

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

25

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

26

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

27

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

28

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
1

1

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

2

Dated: September 17, 2014

3
4

Will44.dis

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2