Franklin v. Foulk
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/17/2015 DENYING plaintiff's 48 motion to compel, as untimely. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHNNY L. FRANKLIN,
12
No. 2:14-cv-0057 KJM DAD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
F. FOULK et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action. Pending before
18
the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel. Defendants Lee, Rohlfing, and Swingle have opposed
19
the motion as untimely.
20
Under the court’s discovery and scheduling order, the parties were required to complete
21
discovery and file any motions to compel on or before March 13, 2015. Plaintiff’s motion to
22
compel filed on June 11, 2015, is therefore untimely.
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel (Doc. No 48)
24
is denied as untimely.
25
Dated: July 17, 2015
26
27
DAD:9
fran0057.oot
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?