Franklin v. Foulk

Filing 58

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/17/2015 DENYING plaintiff's 48 motion to compel, as untimely. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHNNY L. FRANKLIN,

12

No. 2:14-cv-0057 KJM DAD P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

F. FOULK et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action. Pending before

18

the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel. Defendants Lee, Rohlfing, and Swingle have opposed

19

the motion as untimely.

20

Under the court’s discovery and scheduling order, the parties were required to complete

21

discovery and file any motions to compel on or before March 13, 2015. Plaintiff’s motion to

22

compel filed on June 11, 2015, is therefore untimely.

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel (Doc. No 48)

24

is denied as untimely.

25

Dated: July 17, 2015

26
27

DAD:9
fran0057.oot

28
1