Proeung v. Maximus, Inc.

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER 19 for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/15/2014. Parties agree to extend the time for hearing on any Motion for Summary Judgment to 56 days from filing and service of Motion. In addition, parties agree that time to file and serve any opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment shall be not less than 14 days preceding hearing on Motion. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4

David P. Foos (SBN: 083430)
FOOS | GAVIN LAW FIRM, P.C.
3947 Lennane Drive, Suite 120
Sacramento, CA 95834
T: 916.779.3500
F: 916.779.3508
E: [e-mail]

5
6

Attorney for Plaintiff,
SAMBATH PROEUNG

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAMBATH PROEUNG

FOOS | GAVIN LAW FIRM, P.C.
3947 LENNANE DRIVE, SUITE 120
Sacramento, CA 95834

11
12
13
14
15

Case No.: 2:14-cv-00063-MCE-KJN
Plaintiff,
v.
MAXIMUS, INC., a California
Corporation, and DOES 1 through
50, inclusive,

16

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
PERIOD TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
(USDCEDC LOCAL RULE 230)

Defendants.

17
18
19
20

The parties in the above captioned matter agree to stipulate to the following and declare
it as set forth below:
1.

The parties, SAMBATH PROEUNG and MAXIMUS, INC., and their attorneys

21

of record, DAVID P. FOOS and JEREMY MEIER do hereby agree to extend the time for

22

hearing on any motion for summary judgment to fifty-six (56) days from the filing and service

23
24
25
26

of the motion.
2.

In addition, the parties agree that the time to file and serve any opposition to

motion for summary judgment shall be not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the hearing on
the motion.

27
28

Sambath Proeung v. Maximus, Inc., et al.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
PERIOD TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
(USDCEDC LOCAL RULE 230)

Page 1 of 2

1

3.

Furthermore, the parties agree that the time to file and serve any reply to the

2

opposition to any motion for summary judgment shall be no less than seven (7) days from the

3

date of the hearing.

4
5

The foregoing is agreed upon by the parties.

6

FOOS GAVIN LAW FIRM, P.C.

7
8
9

Dated:

By: ___________________________________
David P. Foos (SBN: 083430)
Attorney for Plaintiff,
SAMBATH PROEUNG

Dated:

By: ___________________________________
Jeremy A. Meier (SBN: 139849)
Attorney for Defendant,
MAXIMUS, INC.

10

FOOS | GAVIN LAW FIRM, P.C.
3947 LENNANE DRIVE, SUITE 120
Sacramento, CA 95834

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

IT IS ORDERED:
.
Dated: September 15, 2014

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Sambath Proeung v. Maximus, Inc., et al.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
PERIOD TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
(USDCEDC LOCAL RULE 230)

Page 2 of 2