Sanudo v. Foulk
Filing
20
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/30/14 ORDERING that the 4/7/14 findings and recommendation 16 are VACATED; petitioner's 19 motion to exceed the word count for the first amended federal h abeas petition is GRANTED. It is RECOMMENDED that petitioner's 3 motion to stay his federal habeas petition be denied as moot; respondent's 13 motion to dismiss the original mixed petition without prejudice also be denied as moot; petitioner's 18 motion to lift the stay be denied as unnecessary since no stay was ever entered by the district court; and respondent be directed to file an answer to 17 the first amended federal habeas corpus petition within 60 days of the adoption of the instant findings and recommendation by the district court judge. Motions referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL SANUDO,
12
No. 2:14-cv-0068 GEB AC P
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
FRED FOULK,
15
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
Respondents.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ
18
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States
19
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On April 7, 2014, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations regarding
21
petitioner’s motion to stay and abey his federal habeas corpus petition pending exhaustion of state
22
court remedies. ECF No. 3. During the objection period, petitioner filed a motion to lift the stay
23
based on the California Supreme Court’s order entered on April 9, 2014. ECF No. 18.
24
Concurrent to the filing of the motion, petitioner also filed a first amended habeas petition, ECF
25
No. 17, and a motion to exceed the word count for the amended petition, ECF No. 19.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. The April 7, 2014 findings and recommendation are vacated; and,
28
2. Petitioner’s motion to exceed the word count for the first amended federal habeas
1
1
petition (ECF No. 19) is granted.
2
IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that:
3
1. Petitioner’s motion to stay his federal habeas petition (ECF No. 3) be denied as moot;
4
2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss the original mixed petition without prejudice (ECF
5
6
7
8
9
10
No. 13) also be denied as moot;
3. Petitioner’s motion to lift the stay (ECF No. 18) be denied as unnecessary since no stay
was ever entered by the district court; and,
4. Respondent be directed to file an answer to the first amended federal habeas corpus
petition (ECF No. 17) within 60 days of the adoption of the instant findings and recommendation
by the district court judge.
11
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
12
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
13
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
14
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
15
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
16
objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
17
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
18
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
19
DATED: April 30, 2014
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?