Garcia v. CDCR et al
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/7/2017 DENYING as unnecessary 34 Motion to Terminate Settlement Discussions and GRANTING 37 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's opposition to 36 Motion for Summary Judgment is due by 11/20/2017. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANNY RAY GARCIA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-CV-0093-CMK-P
vs.
ORDER
TSENG,
15
Defendant.
16
/
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se1, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
17
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are: (1) plaintiff’s motion to terminate settlement
19
discussions (Doc. 34); and (2) defendant’s motion for an extension of time (Doc. 37).
20
Plaintiff seeks an order terminating settlement discussions. Because leave of
21
court is not required to end settlement discussions, plaintiff’s motion will be denied as
22
unnecessary.
23
///
24
///
25
1
26
The limited appointment of Michael Erik Vinding, Esq., to represent plaintiff for
purposes of settlement negotiations has expired. See order at Doc. 30.
1
1
Defendant seeks additional time to file an opposition to plaintiff’s motion for
2
summary judgment filed on August 17, 2017. Good cause appearing therefor, defendant’s
3
request will be granted. Defendant’s opposition is due by November 20, 2017.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1.
6
Plaintiff’s motion to terminate settlement discussions (Doc. 34) is denied
as unnecessary;
7
2.
Defendant’s motion for an extension of time (Doc. 37) is granted; and
8
3.
Defendant’s opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is due
9
by November 20, 2017.
10
11
12
13
DATED: September 7, 2017
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?