Hart v. Kloph et al
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/04/14 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CLETE REO HART,
12
No. 2:14-cv-0101 MCE CKD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
J. KLOPH, et al.,
15
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
16
17
By an order filed January 29, 2014, plaintiff was determined to be a “three strikes” litigant
18
pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 1915(g). He was ordered to pay the $400 filing fee for this action within
19
thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this
20
action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the
21
appropriate filing fee.
22
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice.
24
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
25
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
26
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
27
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
28
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
1
1
objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
2
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
3
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
4
Dated: March 4, 2014
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
2 / hart0101.fifp
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?