Jones v. Jaime's Bar & Grill, et al
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/2/14: The deadline for plaintiff to file a motion related to defendants' Amended Answer under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) shall be extended to May 2, 2014. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PAUL L. REIN, Esq. (SBN 43053)
CELIA MCGUINNESS, Esq. (SBN 159420)
CATHERINE CABALO (SBN 248198)
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN
200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: 510/832-5001
Facsimile: 510/832-4787
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GUY JONES
* Defendants and their respective counsel listed after the caption.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
GUY JONES
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-00102-LKK-DAD
JAMIE’S BAR & GRILL; JAMES E.
BUNNELL dba JAMIE’S BAR & GRILL;
AKFM HOLDINGS, LLC; and DOES 1-
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME UNDER
FED.R.CIV.P. RULE 12(F)
10, Inclusive,
Defendants.
JOHN QUINCY BROWN III, Esq. (SBN 60681)
STEPHEN W. ROBERTSON, Esq. (SBN 228708)
HARDY ERICH BROWN & WILSON
A Professional Law Corporation
1000 G Street, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95814
P.O. Box 13530
Sacramento, California 95853-3530
Telephone: 916/449-3800
Facsimile: 916/449-3888
Attorney for Defendant JAMES E. BUNNELL
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME UNDER
FRCP RULE 12(F)
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-00102-LKK-DAD
-1G:\DOCS\Orders For Docketing\LKK\2014 04 01 Stip to extend time under Rule 12(f).docx
1
2
dba JAMIE’S BAR & GRILL
5
TERENCE J. CASSIDY, Esq. (SBN 099180)
PORTER SCOTT
A Professional Law Corporation
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
Telephone: 916/929-1481
Facsimile: 916/927-3706
6
Attorney for Defendant AKFM HOLDINGS, LLC
3
4
7
8
TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT AND TO ALL
9
PARTIES AND TO THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
10
STIPULATION
11
12
13
14
WHEREAS, the parties to this stipulation want to make best efforts to settle
this case without unnecessary litigation;
WHEREAS, plaintiff Guy Jones’ deadline for filing a motion under
15
Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f) to strike defenses from the Answer of defendant James E. Bunnell
16
dba Jamie’s Bar & Grill (Docket No. 14) is April 1, 2014, and to strike defenses from
17
the Answer of defendant AKFM Holdings, LLC (Docket No. 16) is April 2, 2014;
18
WHEREAS, the parties have tried unsuccessfully to resolve their disputes over
19
the Answers informally. However, they wish to avoid the necessity of plaintiff filing
20
a Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f) motion until/unless continued settlement efforts do not succeed;
21
THEREFORE:
22
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among all parties that the deadline for
23
plaintiff to file a motion related to defendants’ respective Answers under
24
Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f) be extended to May 2, 2014.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME UNDER
FRCP RULE 12(F)
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-00102-LKK-DAD
-2G:\DOCS\Orders For Docketing\LKK\2014 04 01 Stip to extend time under Rule 12(f).docx
1
2
Date: March 31, 2014
LAW OFFICE OF PAUL L. REIN
3
By: /s/ Catherine Cabalo
CATHERINE CABALO, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GUY JONES
4
5
6
7
Date: March 31, 2014
8
By: /s/ John Quincy Brown, III
JOHN QUINCY BROWN III, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendant
JAMES E. BUNNELL dba JAMIE’S BAR &
GRILL
9
10
11
HARDY ERICH BROWN & WILSON, PC
Date: April 1, 2014
PORTER SCOTT, PC
12
By: /s/ Terence J. Cassidy
TERENCE J. CASSIDY, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendant
AKFM HOLDINGS, LLC
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
18
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, it is hereby
19
20
21
22
23
ORDERED that the deadline for plaintiff to file a motion related to defendants’
Amended Answer under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) be extended to May 2,
2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: April 2, 2014
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME UNDER
FRCP RULE 12(F)
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-00102-LKK-DAD
-3G:\DOCS\Orders For Docketing\LKK\2014 04 01 Stip to extend time under Rule 12(f).docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?