United States of America v. Hartz
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/14/2014 DENYING defendants's 7 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant shall file a responsive pleading no later than 3/27/2014. Defendant is cautioned that failure to file a responsive pleading may result in recommendation that Default Judgment be entered against her. All Pretrial Motions shall be completed by 5/7/2014. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0112 WBS CKD PS
v.
ORDER
RUTHIE HARTZ,
15
Defendant.
16
Defendant is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was referred to this court under
17
18
Local Rule 302(c)(21). ECF No. 9.
On March 10, 2014, defendant filed a document purporting to dismiss this action. ECF
19
20
No. 7. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, defendant’s filing is improper and will be
21
denied.
Defendant was served with summons on February 5, 2014; defendant’s responsive
22
23
pleading was due February 26, 2014. ECF No. 4. Defendant filed a document on February 25,
24
2014. However, that document is non-responsive to the complaint. In light of defendant’s pro se
25
status, defendant will be granted an extension of time to file a responsive pleading. Defendant is
26
cautioned that failure to timely file a responsive pleading may result in entry of default judgment
27
against defendant.
28
/////
1
1
Upon review of the entire docket, the court has determined that the only scheduling that
2
need be done at this time is to set a cut-off date for law and motion. Accordingly, all law and
3
motion is left open, save and except that it shall be conducted so as to be completed by May 7,
4
2014. The word “completed” in this context means that all law and motion matters must be heard
5
by the above date. The parties are cautioned to refer to the local rules regarding the requirements
6
for noticing such motions on the court’s regularly scheduled law and motion calendar.
7
The parties should keep in mind that the purpose of law and motion is to narrow and
8
refine the legal issues raised by the case, and to dispose of by pretrial motion those issues that are
9
susceptible to resolution without trial. To accomplish that purpose, the parties need to identify
10
and fully research the issues presented by the case, and then examine those issues in light of the
11
evidence gleaned through discovery. If it appears after examining the legal issues and facts that
12
an issue can be resolved by pretrial motion, the parties are to file the appropriate motion by the
13
law and motion cutoff set forth supra.
14
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
15
1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7) is denied.
16
2. Defendant shall file a responsive pleading no later than March 27, 2014. Defendant is
17
cautioned that failure to file a responsive pleading may result in a recommendation that default
18
judgment be entered against defendant.
19
20
3. All pretrial motions shall be completed by May 7, 2014.
Dated: March 14, 2014
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
4 usa-hartz.cuo
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?