Bond v. United States, et al.

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/12/14 denying 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The clerk of the court shall provide plaintiff with another copy of the in forma pauperis application used by this court for non-prisoners. Plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, a fully completed in forma pauperis application. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM BOND, 12 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-0125 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNITED STATES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former federal detainee proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF Nos. 1, 2. Based on plaintiff’s January 31, 2014 change of 20 address which indicates that he is no longer incarcerated, the court is unable to determine whether 21 plaintiff is indigent and unable to pay the filing fees for the present action. ECF No. 4. 22 Therefore, plaintiff will be provided an opportunity to update his financial status by submitting a 23 fully completed application to proceed in forma pauperis by a non-prisoner. 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No.2) is denied without 26 27 28 prejudice; 2. The Clerk of the Court shall provide plaintiff with another copy of the in forma pauperis application used by this court for non-prisoners; and 1 1 3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a fully completed 2 in forma pauperis application. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a 3 recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 4 DATED: February 12, 2014 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?