Rinehart et al v. Walgreen Co.

Filing 62

ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/21/2017 ORDERING All claims asserted in this action are DISMISSED with prejudice as to Relator; All claims asserted in this action for the Covered Conduct as that term is defined in the Settlement Agreement between the United States, California, Relator, and defendant Walgreen Co. are DISMISSED with prejudice as to the United States and California. All other claims asserted in this action are DISMISSED without prejudice as to the United States and California. CASE CLOSED (Washington, S)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF 2:14-cv-0148 KJM EFB
CALIFORNIA, ex rel. DEBBIE G. RINEHART,
Plaintiffs,

10
11
12
13

vs.

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION
OF DISMISSAL

WALGREEN CO.,
Defendant.

14
15
16

Upon consideration of the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal filed by the United States, California

17 and relator Debbie Rinehart (Relator), and after taking into account the best interests of the parties
18 involved and the public purposes behind the False Claims Act, 31 USC § 3730(b)(1), and the California
19 False Claims Act, Cal. Gov’t Code § 13652, it is hereby ORDERED that:
20

1) All claims asserted in this action are dismissed with prejudice as to Relator; and

21

2) All claims asserted in this action for the Covered Conduct as that term is defined in the

22

Settlement Agreement between the United States, California, Relator, and defendant

23

Walgreen Co. are dismissed with prejudice as to the United States and California. All other

24

claims asserted in this action are dismissed without prejudice as to the United States and

25

California.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27 DATE: July 21, 2017.
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Joint Stipulation of Dismissal; Order

1