Melgar v. Zicam LLC, et al

Filing 113

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/15/2015 GRANTING 108 Notice of Request to Seal Documents filed by defendants. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

ALAN J. LAZARUS (SBN #129767)
[e-mail]
WILLIAM A. HANSSEN (SBN #110613)
[e-mail]
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2235
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
ZICAM LLC and MATRIXX
INITIATIVES, INC.

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15

YESENIA MELGAR, on Behalf of Herself
and all Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
ZICAM LLC and MATRIXX
INITIATIVES, INC.,

16

Defendants.

Case No. 2:14-cv-00160-MCE-AC
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CERTAIN DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANTS’ REPLIES IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO
EXCLUDE PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT
TESTIMONY

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRIN KER BIDDLE &
R E A T H LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST
TO SEAL DEFENDANTS’ DOCUMENTS ISO REPLIES ISO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE

83551822.1

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00160-MCE-AC

1

Having considered Defendants’ Notice of Request, Request to Seal Motion, and the

2

Parties’ Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 17), this Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’

3

Request to Seal documents filed in support of Defendants’ replies in support of summary

4

judgment and motions to exclude Plaintiff’s expert testimony.

5

The Court finds and orders the following references be filed under seal:

6

•

Defendants’ Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the

7

Alternative Summary Adjudication, at i:6, 1:3-5, 1:8-10, 1:25, 2:1, 2:8-9, 2:11, 2:15-

8

17, 3:1-4:11, 4:14, 4:23-24, 5:2-11, 6:1-12, 6:20-21, 6:23-28, 7:23-26, 10:1-2.

9

•

10
11

Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Separate Statement of Disputed Facts in Support
of Motion for Summary Judgment, at pp. 2-46.

•

Defendants’ Objections to Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Separate Statement of

12

Undisputed Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, at 3:4-18, 3:22-27,

13

4:3-9, 4:24-28, 5:3-27:19, 27:26-28, 28:3-4.

14

•

Defendants’ Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony

15

of Plaintiff’s Designated Expert Noel R. Rose, M.D., Ph.D., at 2:10, 7:17-18, 7:25-9:6,

16

9:23-24.

17

•

Defendants’ Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony

18

of Plaintiff’s Designated Expert R. Barker Bausell, Ph.D., at 2:6, 7:15-16, 7:25-9:10,

19

9:27-28, 10:4-7.

20

•

Exhibit BB to the Declaration of William A. Hanssen, the Deposition of R. Eccles,

21

B.Sc., Ph.D., D.Sc., taken on June 16, 2015, at pp. 135-136, 138-141, 145-148, 168,

22

176-179, 181-184, 188-189.

23

•

24
25

Exhibit CC to the Declaration of William A. Hanssen, the Deposition of Susan E.
Potts, taken on April 1, 2015, at pp. 122-123, 127-128.

•

Exhibit DD to the Declaration of William A. Hanssen, Deposition of Noel R. Rose,

26

M.D., Ph.D., taken on April 24, 2015 and May 12, 2015, at pp. 40-66, 68, 72-75, 78-

27

79, 98-102, 106-108, 110-111, 145, 248-252, 258-262.

28
DRIN KER BIDDLE &
R E A T H LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST
TO SEAL DEFENDANTS’ DOCUMENTS ISO REPLIES ISO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE

-2-

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00160-MCE-AC

1

•

Exhibit EE to the Declaration of William A. Hanssen, Deposition of R. Barker

2

Bausell, Ph.D., taken on April 17, 2015, at pp. 54-56, 81, 85-86, 98-100, 141, 144-

3

146.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 15, 2015

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRIN KER BIDDLE &
R E A T H LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST
TO SEAL DEFENDANTS’ DOCUMENTS ISO REPLIES ISO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE

-3-

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00160-MCE-AC