Melgar v. Zicam LLC, et al

Filing 128

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/22/16: Proposed Notice Plan Hearing RESET for 7/28/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before District Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 6 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006) L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626) Annick M. Persinger (State Bar No. 272996) 1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 300-4455 Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 E-Mail: scott@bursor.com ltfisher@bursor.com apersinger@bursor.com 7 Class Counsel 8 13 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP Alan J. Lazarus (State Bar No. 129767) William A. Hanssen (State Bar No. 110613) Ashley K. Corkery (State Bar. No. 301380) 50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 E-Mail: alan.lazarus@dbr.com william.hanssen@dbr.com ashley.corkery@dbr.com 14 Counsel for Defendants 2 3 4 5 9 10 11 12 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 YESENIA MELGAR, on Behalf of Herself and all Others Similarly Situated, 19 20 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:14-cv-00160-MCE-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED NOTICE PLAN 21 22 23 ZICAM LLC and MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC. Defendants. Courtroom: 7 Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00160-MCE-AC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff Yesenia Melgar, on behalf of herself and the certified class (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants Zicam LLC and Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on June 15, 2016, the Court issued a Minute Order vacating the June 16, 2016 hearing on Plaintiff’s Proposed Notice Plan and re-scheduled the hearing for June 30, 2016. Dkt. No. 126. WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel L. Timothy Fisher is unavailable on June 30, 2016 due to a deposition scheduled in another case. WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel and Defendants’ counsel have agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, to re-schedule the hearing on Plaintiff’s Proposed Notice Plan from June 30, 2016 to July 28, 2016 or as soon thereafter as the Court is available. Now, therefore, the parties, through the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The hearing on Plaintiff’s Proposed Notice Plan currently set for June 30, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. shall be vacated. 2. The hearing on Plaintiff’s Proposed Notice Plan shall be re-scheduled for July 28, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the Court is available. 17 18 Dated: June 20, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 19 20 21 22 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. By: /s/ L. Timothy Fisher L. Timothy Fisher 27 Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006) L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626) Annick M. Persinger (State Bar No. 272996) 1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 300-4455 Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 E-Mail: scott@bursor.com ltfisher@bursor.com apersinger@bursor.com 28 Class Counsel 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00160-MCE-AC 1 Dated: June 20, 2016 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 2 By: /s/ William A. Hanssen William A. Hanssen 3 4 Alan J. Lazarus (State Bar No. 129767) William A. Hanssen (State Bar No. 110613) Ashley K. Corkery (State Bar. No. 301380) 50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 E-Mail: alan.lazarus@dbr.com william.hanssen@dbr.com ashley.corkery@dbr.com 5 6 7 8 9 Counsel for Defendants 10 11 ORDER 12 13 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the hearing on Plaintiff’s Proposed Notice Plan 14 currently set for June 30, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. is hereby VACATED and CONTINUED to July 28, 15 2016 at 2:00 p.m. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 22, 2016 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00160-MCE-AC 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?