Public Service Mutual Insurance Co. v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation

Filing 19

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/17/2015 ORDERING that the Settlement Conference set for 7/30/2015 is VACATED and RESET for 11/19/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP 2 Patrick Fredette, #207284 patrick.fredette@mccormickbarstow.com 3 Timothy R. Sullivan, #128467 timothy.sullivan@mccormickbarstow.com 4 7647 North Fresno Street 5 Fresno, California 93720 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 6 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 7 Attorneys for Defendant LIBERTY SURPLUS 8 INSURANCE CORPORATION 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 Case No. 2:14-CV-00226-MCE-KJN STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE v. 17 LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, et al., 18 Defendant. 19 20 By way of a signed stipulation submitted July 10, 2015 (ECF No. 18), the parties stipulated to 21 the following: 22 Plaintiff Public Service Mutual Insurance Company (“Public Service”) and Defendant Liberty 23 Surplus Insurance Corporation (“Liberty Surplus”) previously participated in mediation efforts in 24 relation to the underlying liability action (Balfour v. Fair Oaks Fountains, LLC, et al., Sacramento 25 County Superior Court Case No. 34-2010-00082562). Those mediation efforts did not resolve the 26 dispute between Public Service and Liberty Surplus. Based on the parties’ continued discussions, they 27 believe that the mandatory settlement conference scheduled for July 30, 2015, should be postponed to 28 a date in October that will accommodate the Court’s schedule. Because of the dispute between the MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET FRESNO, CA 93720 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 1 parties, and past mediation efforts, the parties believe that a settlement conference will be more 2 productive after the parties file respective motions for summary judgment, which one or both parties 3 are in the process of preparing and conferring regarding dates. The parties believe that a settlement 4 conference will be an unproductive use of the Court’s time, as well as the parties’ time, prior to the 5 filing of the motions for summary judgment. 6 In light of the foregoing, the parties stipulate to request the Court continue the Mandatory 7 Settlement Conference currently set for July 30, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., to a date and time to be selected 8 by the Court in October 2015. 9 ORDER 10 11 Pursuant to the parties’ signed stipulation (ECF No. 18), it is hereby ORDERED that the 12 Mandatory Settlement Conference scheduled for July 30, 2015 is VACATED. Although the parties 13 requested that the settlement conference before the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan be held in October 14 2015, Judge Brennan is not available for a settlement conference in that month; the earliest he is 15 available thereafter is November 19, 2015. Accordingly, the Mandatory Settlement Conference shall 16 be held on November 19, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8 before the Honorable Edmund F. 17 Brennan. 18 Dated: July 17, 2015 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET FRESNO, CA 93720 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?