Public Service Mutual Insurance Co. v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/31/2015 VACATING the deadline for exchange of expert witness information set for 8/25/2015; ORDERING the parties to exchange expert witness information by 11/1/2015; ORDERING that no other deadlines identified in the 17 Pretrial Scheduling Order be affected. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP 2 Patrick Fredette, #207284 patrick.fredette@mccormickbarstow.com 3 Timothy R. Sullivan, #128467 timothy.sullivan@mccormickbarstow.com 4 7647 North Fresno Street 5 Fresno, California 93720 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 6 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 7 Attorneys for Defendant LIBERTY SURPLUS 8 INSURANCE CORPORATION 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 Case No. 2:14-CV-00226-MCE-KJN ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR EXPERT WITNESS INFORMATION EXCHANGE v. 17 LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, et al., 18 Defendant. 19 20 Plaintiff Public Service Mutual Insurance Company (“Public Service”) and Defendant Liberty 21 Surplus Insurance Corporation (“Liberty Surplus”) previously participated in mediation efforts in 22 relation to the underlying liability action (Balfour v. Fair Oaks Fountains, LLC, et al., Sacramento 23 County Superior Court Case No. 34-2010-00082562) which did not resolve the dispute between 24 Public Service and Liberty Surplus. Because of the nature of the issues, past mediation efforts, and 25 information and documents exchanged in discovery, the parties believe that the dispute is amenable to 26 summary judgment or partial summary judgment, which one or both parties are in the process of 27 preparing and conferring regarding dates. The parties believe that exchange of expert witness 28 information prior to resolution of those motions would be premature, and an unnecessary expenditure MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET FRESNO, CA 93720 ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR EXPERT WITNESS INFORMATION EXCHANGE 1 of their respective resources, and would have to be amended following summary judgment or partial 2 summary judgment rulings. 3 In light of the foregoing, the parties submitted a signed stipulation (ECF No. 20) in which they 4 requested that the Court continue the current August 25, 2015 deadline for exchange of expert witness 5 information to November1, 2015, to allow time for motions for summary judgment and/or partial 6 summary judgment to be filed and heard. 7 Pursuant to the parties’ signed stipulation (ECF No. 20) and a showing of good cause, the 8 August 25, 2015 deadline for exchange of expert witness information is VACATED, and the deadline 9 for exchange of expert witness information shall be November 1, 2015. This Order does not affect 10 any other deadlines identified in the January 15, 2015 Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 17). 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 31, 2015 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET FRESNO, CA 93720 2 ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR EXPERT WITNESS INFORMATION EXCHANGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?