Nguy v. County of Yolo, California et al

Filing 44

ORDER adopting 43 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/26/14: Motions to Dismiss 5 , 6 and 17 are GRANTED. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DINH NGUY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

No. 2:14-cv-229-MCE-EFB PS

v.

ORDER

COUNTY OF YOLO; SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE
COUNTY OF YOLO; DANIEL P.
McGUIRE; JEFF STONE; MARVIN C.
MARX; JOHN C. ORCUTT; WENDY A
TAYLOR; WILLIAM MARDER,

18

Defendants.

19
On September 9, 2014, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations, ECF

20
21

No. 43, herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to

22

the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were

23

filed.
The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

24
25

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly:

2

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed September 9, 2014, ECF No. 43, are

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. Defendant Maguire’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 5, is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims
against Defendant Maguire are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND;
3. Defendant Orcutt’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 6, is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims
against Defendant Orcutt are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND;
4. Defendant Taylor’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 17, is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims
against Defendant Taylor are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 26, 2014

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2