Washington v. Nangalama et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/12/15 denying 27 Motion to Compel responses. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to conduct discovery is denied. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

KENNETH WASHINGTON,

11
12
13

No. 2:14-cv-0232 CKD P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

ANDREW NANGALAMA, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16

On November 6, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion asking that defendants be compelled to

17

respond to certain discovery requests. Because plaintiff admits that his requests were not timely-

18

served upon defendants, his motion will be denied. To the extent plaintiff now seeks an extension

19

of time to serve requests for discovery, that request will be denied as plaintiff fails to explain why

20

he did not seek an extension of time before the time to serve discovery requests expired. See Fed.

21

R. Civ. P. 6 (b)(1)(B).

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

23

1. Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery responses (ECF No. 27) is denied; and

24

2. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to conduct discovery is denied.

25

Dated: March 12, 2015

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

1/wash0232.mtc