Cooley v. City of Vallejo
Filing
70
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/15/15 ORDERING that plaintiff's 64 motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is dropped from the court's 5/22/15 calendar without prejudice to the hearing being re-noticed in the event a motion for substitution is timely filed by plaintiff's successor or representative. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FREDERICK MARCELES COOLEY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0240 DAD PS
v.
ORDER
CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On April 8, 2015, plaintiff filed a motion in this action for leave to file a second amended
17
18
complaint.1 (Dkt. No. 64.) That motion was scheduled to be heard on the court’s May 22, 2015
19
calendar. However, on April 23, 2015, defendants filed a notice that plaintiff passed away on
20
April 22, 2015. (Dkt. No. 68.)
According to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a), when a party to the action passes
21
22
away, a motion for substitution may be made by the decedent’s successor or representative within
23
90 days as long as the parties’ claim is not extinguished. FED. R. CIV. P. 25(a). Title 42 U.S.C. '
24
1983 does not address the survival of actions upon the death of either the plaintiff or defendant.
25
Robertson v. Wegmann, 436 U.S. 584, 589 (1978). In areas such as this on which federal law is
26
silent, 42 U.S.C. § 1988 directs federal courts to borrow the law of the forum state unless it is
27
28
1
The parties have previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(c)(1). (Dkt. No. 22.)
1
1
inconsistent with the purposes of the federal law. Id. In California, “a cause of action for or
2
against a person is not lost by reason of the person’s death.” CAL. CIV. PROC. CODE § 377.20.
3
Accordingly, plaintiff’s cause of action is not extinguished by his death and his successor or
4
representative has 90 days from the filing of defendants’ notice of death on the record to file a
5
motion for substitution. The failure to file a timely motion will result in the dismissal of this
6
action. FED. R. CIV. P. 25(a)(1).
7
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s April 8, 2015 motion for leave to
8
file a second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 64) is dropped from the court’s May 22, 2015
9
calendar without prejudice to the hearing being re-noticed in the event a motion for substitution is
10
timely filed by plaintiff’s successor or representative.
11
Dated: May 15, 2015
12
13
14
DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.consent\cooley0240.nod.ord.docx
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?