Cooley v. City of Vallejo

Filing 70

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/15/15 ORDERING that plaintiff's 64 motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is dropped from the court's 5/22/15 calendar without prejudice to the hearing being re-noticed in the event a motion for substitution is timely filed by plaintiff's successor or representative. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FREDERICK MARCELES COOLEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-0240 DAD PS v. ORDER CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On April 8, 2015, plaintiff filed a motion in this action for leave to file a second amended 17 18 complaint.1 (Dkt. No. 64.) That motion was scheduled to be heard on the court’s May 22, 2015 19 calendar. However, on April 23, 2015, defendants filed a notice that plaintiff passed away on 20 April 22, 2015. (Dkt. No. 68.) According to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a), when a party to the action passes 21 22 away, a motion for substitution may be made by the decedent’s successor or representative within 23 90 days as long as the parties’ claim is not extinguished. FED. R. CIV. P. 25(a). Title 42 U.S.C. ' 24 1983 does not address the survival of actions upon the death of either the plaintiff or defendant. 25 Robertson v. Wegmann, 436 U.S. 584, 589 (1978). In areas such as this on which federal law is 26 silent, 42 U.S.C. § 1988 directs federal courts to borrow the law of the forum state unless it is 27 28 1 The parties have previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(c)(1). (Dkt. No. 22.) 1 1 inconsistent with the purposes of the federal law. Id. In California, “a cause of action for or 2 against a person is not lost by reason of the person’s death.” CAL. CIV. PROC. CODE § 377.20. 3 Accordingly, plaintiff’s cause of action is not extinguished by his death and his successor or 4 representative has 90 days from the filing of defendants’ notice of death on the record to file a 5 motion for substitution. The failure to file a timely motion will result in the dismissal of this 6 action. FED. R. CIV. P. 25(a)(1). 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s April 8, 2015 motion for leave to 8 file a second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 64) is dropped from the court’s May 22, 2015 9 calendar without prejudice to the hearing being re-noticed in the event a motion for substitution is 10 timely filed by plaintiff’s successor or representative. 11 Dated: May 15, 2015 12 13 14 DAD:6 Ddad1\orders.consent\cooley0240.nod.ord.docx 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?