Shamberger et al v. Tello et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/28/2016 resetting the hearing on 23 Defendant Tello's Motion for Summary Judgment for 11/28/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Kirksey Smith, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
John A. Lavra, CSB No.: 114533
3620 American River Drive, Suite 230
Sacramento, CA 95864
Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: 916-974-8510
Attorneys for County of Yolo and
Dana Tello
Harry D. Roth - SBN 80611
Attorneys at Law
808 East Eighth St.
Davis, California 95616
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Lindsey Shamberger and Minor Son

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

14
15
16
17
18
19

LINDSEY SHAMBERGER, as an
) Case No.: 2:14-cv-00243-WBS-DAD
individual and on behalf of her minor son, )
EC,
) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
) ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
Plaintiff,
) DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
) SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE
vs.
) ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY
) ADJUDICATION
DANA TELLO and COUNTY OF YOLO, )
)
Defendant

20
21

COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective counsel and subject to

22

the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that this Court continue the

23

hearing date on Defendant Tello’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative,

24

Summary Adjudication to Monday, November 28, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.

25

WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, on October 27, 2016, the Court

26

ordered that the complaint and claims of Plaintiff Lindsey Shamberger against Defendants Dana

27

Tello and County of Yolo are dismissed with prejudice [ECF No. 27];

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment, or in the alternative Summary Adjudication

Page - 1

1
2

WHEREAS, additional time is required to effectuate the dismissal and/or compromise
of the claims of Plaintiff E.C., a minor;

3

WHEREAS, continuing the hearing date will not prejudice any party or their counsel;

4

WHEREAS, this request is not being made for the purpose of delay, or any other

5
6

improper purpose; and
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between the parties

7

that this Court continue the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the

8

alternative, Summary Adjudication as set forth above.

9

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

10
11

LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP

Dated: 10/27/2016

12
By:

13
14

John A. Lavra
JOHN A. LAVRA,
Attorney for County of Yolo and Dana Tello
/S/

15
16

Dated: 10/27/2016

17

By: /s/ Harry D. Roth
HARRY D. ROTH
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Lindsey Shamberger and Minor Son

18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20

Dated: October 28, 2016

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment, or in the alternative Summary Adjudication

Page - 2