Johnson v. Patel et al

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/4/14 ORDERING that plaintiff's motions to enforce judgment 16 , 17 , are DENIED without prejudice. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SCOTT JOHNSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-0279 TLN CKD

v.

ORDER

ANIL PATEL, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff has filed two motions to enforce judgment. The applications are deficient. The

18

motions were improperly noticed for a date which is not on the court’s law and motion calendar.

19

In addition, the check box forms used by plaintiff in support of the application inconsistently state

20

that plaintiff seeks enforcement of a judgment and attachment of a third person. The forms also

21

incorrectly state that this court is not the court in which the money judgment was entered. The

22

forms also indicate that the judgment debtor has been examined within the past 120 days but do

23

not attach an affidavit showing good cause for another examination. Finally, no proposed order

24

was submitted to the court as required under the Local Rules.

25

/////

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions to enforce judgment

2

(ECF Nos. 16, 17) are denied without prejudice.

3

Dated: November 4, 2014

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7

4 johnson-patel.jde

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2