Kemper v. Pie, et al.

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/29/15 DENYING 32 Motion for Sanctions. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WINSTON KEMPER, 12 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-0305 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DR. CROSSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(c). 20 On June 8, 2015, plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions. Plaintiff claims that on March 4, 21 2015, the court ordered defendants “to submit summary judgment statements” within 60 days. 22 (ECF No. 32.) Because defendants have not filed such statements, plaintiff asks the court to 23 impose sanctions. However, plaintiff is mistaken. On March 4, 2015, the court ordered the U.S. 24 Marshal to serve process on defendants. If defendants do not waive services of process, the U.S. 25 Marshal is required to personally serve process on defendants. Once service of process is 26 accomplished, the U.S. Marshal will return summons. Defendants are not required to file a 27 responsive pleading until after service of process is accomplished, and their deadline to respond 28 varies depending on whether they waive service or are personally served. At this point, summons 1 1 demonstrating that service of process has been accomplished have not yet been filed, so no 2 deadline is presently pending for either defendant. Thus, plaintiff’s motion for sanctions is 3 denied. Once defendants have filed an answer, the court will issue a scheduling order that will set 4 deadlines for the filing of dispositive motions, including motions for summary judgment. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for sanctions is denied 6 without prejudice. 7 Dated: June 29, 2015 8 9 10 /kemp0305.san 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?