Stewart v. Cassidy
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/2/15 DENYING 40 ; GRANTING 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 and 49 Motions in Limine. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
COLLEEN STEWART,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0326 CKD
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
KEVIN CASSIDY,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
The parties have filed motions in limine. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
19
1. Plaintiff’s motion in limine (ECF No. 40) to redact the word “lesbian” from
20
defendant’s medical record dated January 18, 2013 and replaced with the word “ugly” is denied.
21
2. Defendant’s motion in limine (ECF No. 43) re: evidence contained in learned work is
22
granted. The proffered procedures shall be utilized at trial in the event any party seeks to
23
introduce evidence, for impeachment purposes, that is contained in a treatise, periodical, or
24
pamphlet.
25
26
27
28
3. Defendant’s motion in limine (ECF No. 44) re: jury disclosure of Dr. Robert Gillis’
death is granted. A jury instruction will be given regarding the death of Dr. Gillis.
4. Defendant’s motion in limine (ECF No. 45) re: MICRA applicability and its effect on
trial is granted.
1
1
2
3
4
5
5. Defendant’s motion in limine (ECF No. 46) to exclude all witnesses from the
courtroom until they are called to testify at trial is granted.
6. Defendant’s motion in limine (ECF No. 47) to exclude evidence of defendant’s
professional liability insurance is granted.
7. Defendant’s motion in limine (ECF No. 49) to exclude Craig Pulsipher, D.D.S. from
6
rendering any expert opinions relating to prosthodontic standard of care is granted.
7
Dated: June 2, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
4 stewart0326.motlimine
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?