Stewart v. Cassidy

Filing 65

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/2/15 DENYING 40 ; GRANTING 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 and 49 Motions in Limine. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COLLEEN STEWART, 12 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-0326 CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER KEVIN CASSIDY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 The parties have filed motions in limine. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 19 1. Plaintiff’s motion in limine (ECF No. 40) to redact the word “lesbian” from 20 defendant’s medical record dated January 18, 2013 and replaced with the word “ugly” is denied. 21 2. Defendant’s motion in limine (ECF No. 43) re: evidence contained in learned work is 22 granted. The proffered procedures shall be utilized at trial in the event any party seeks to 23 introduce evidence, for impeachment purposes, that is contained in a treatise, periodical, or 24 pamphlet. 25 26 27 28 3. Defendant’s motion in limine (ECF No. 44) re: jury disclosure of Dr. Robert Gillis’ death is granted. A jury instruction will be given regarding the death of Dr. Gillis. 4. Defendant’s motion in limine (ECF No. 45) re: MICRA applicability and its effect on trial is granted. 1 1 2 3 4 5 5. Defendant’s motion in limine (ECF No. 46) to exclude all witnesses from the courtroom until they are called to testify at trial is granted. 6. Defendant’s motion in limine (ECF No. 47) to exclude evidence of defendant’s professional liability insurance is granted. 7. Defendant’s motion in limine (ECF No. 49) to exclude Craig Pulsipher, D.D.S. from 6 rendering any expert opinions relating to prosthodontic standard of care is granted. 7 Dated: June 2, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 4 stewart0326.motlimine 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?