Brown v. Sagireddy et al

Filing 54

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/12/15: The findings and recommendations filed April 13, 2015 (ECF No. 50), are adopted in full. Plaintiff's documents (ECF Nos. 20, 27, 28, 35, 36, 44, 47, 48, 49), construed as motions for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, are denied.(Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DEXTER BROWN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-00338 JAM AC P

v.

ORDER

PURUSHOTTAMA SAGIREDDY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On April 13, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

20
21

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 50. Neither

23

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 13, 2015 (ECF No. 50), are adopted in

27
28

full;
1

1

2. Plaintiff’s documents (ECF Nos. 20, 27, 28, 35, 36, 44, 47, 48, 49), construed as

2

motions for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, are denied.

3

DATED: June 12, 2015

4

/s/ John A. Mendez_________________________

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2