Brown v. Sagireddy et al

Filing 85

ORDER adopting in full 84 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/29/17. Defendant Sagireddy's 70 motion to dismiss the claims in Count I and III is DENIED. Defendant Sagireddy is DIRECTED to file an answer to Counts I and III of the amended complaint within 30 days. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DEXTER BROWN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-0338 JAM AC P

v.

ORDER

PURUSHOTTAMA SAGIREDDY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 2, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

20
21

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. ECF No. 84. Neither party has

23

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 2, 2017 (ECF No. 84), are adopted in

27
28

full;
1

1
2
3

2. Defendant Sagireddy’s motion to dismiss the claims in Count I and III (ECF No. 70) is
DENIED.
3. Defendant Sagireddy is directed to file an answer to Counts I and III of the amended

4

complaint within 30 days.

5

DATED: March 29, 2017

6

/s/ John A. Mendez________________________

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2