Fuimaono v. Solano County Sheriff Department, et al
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/7/2014 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY FUIMAONO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 2:14-00347 AC P
ORDER
SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a former county detainee, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States
19
Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings on February 18, 2014. ECF No. 5.
On February 24, 2014, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause within thirty days why his
20
21
complaint should not be summarily dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim. ECF
22
No. 6. By the same order, plaintiff was ordered to complete an in forma pauperis application for
23
non-prisoners and was cautioned that a failure to respond to the court’s order would result in a
24
recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and
25
plaintiff has not filed an in forma pauperis application or responded to the show cause order.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
2
See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
3
DATED: April 7, 2014
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?