Gutierrez, et al. v. Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC, et al.

Filing 103

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/5/17 ORDERING the parties are directed to file a joint status report not later than October 16, 2017. In addition, the Court previously took under submission Plaintiffs' Motion t o Conditionally Certify FLSA Collective Action (ECF No. 79 ) and Leave to Renew Motion (ECF No. 80 ). Given that judgment has since been ordered against Carter Brothers, those Motions are hereby DENIED without prejudice to renewal addressing the changed status of the parties. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

RAMSES GUTIERREZ, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, et al.,

13
14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiffs,

No. 2:14-cv-00351-MCE-CKD

ORDER

v.
CARTER BROTHERS SECURITY
SERVICES, LLC; AT&T DIGITAL LIFE,
INC.; PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE
COMPANY dba AT&T DATACOMM,
INC., AT&T CORP.; and DOES 1
through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.

19
20
21

On September 15, 2017, this Court granted a Motion to Withdraw filed by former

22

counsel for Defendant Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC (“Carter Brothers”), and

23

entered default judgment against that Defendant. ECF No. 102. Previously, the Court

24

had ordered:

25
26
27
28

Not later than ten (10) days following the date an order is
electronically filed resolving Gordon & Rees’ Motion to
Withdraw as Counsel, the parties are directed to file a joint
status report regarding the issuance of an Amended
Scheduling Order
ECF No. 96. No joint status report has been filed. Accordingly, the parties are again
1

1

directed to file such a report not later than October 16, 2017. Failure to comply with the

2

orders of this Court will result in the imposition of sanctions upon no further notice to the

3

parties.

4

In addition, the Court previously took under submission Plaintiffs’ Motion to

5

Conditionally Certify FLSA Collective Action (ECF No. 79) and Leave to Renew Motion

6

(ECF No. 80). Given that judgment has since been ordered against Carter Brothers,

7

those Motions are hereby DENIED without prejudice to renewal addressing the changed

8

status of the parties.

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 5, 2017

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2