Gutierrez, et al. v. Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC, et al.
Filing
111
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/28/18 ORDERING that The matter's referral to the Court's Voluntary Resolution Program is postponed; and The Parties shall file a Joint Status Report on or before 11/26/2018, regarding the status of settlement discussions. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
JESSE A. CRIPPS, SBN 222285
jcripps@gibsondunn.com
KATHERINE V.A. SMITH, SBN 247866
ksmith@gibsondunn.com
ASHLEY ALLYN, SBN 254559
aallyn@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520
JOSEPH W. ROSE, SBN 232261
joe@joeroselaw.com
MEHRAN TAHOORI, SBN 283313
mehran@joeroselaw.com
ROSE LAW, A PROF. CORP.
11335 Gold Express Drive, Suite 135
Gold River, California 95670
Telephone: (916) 273-1260
Facsimile: (916) 290-0148
Attorneys for Defendant
AT&T DIGITAL LIFE, INC.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
RAMSES GUTIERREZ, et. al. individually,
and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
16
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
21
v.
CARTER BROTHERS SECURITY
SERVICES, LLC., AT&T DIGITAL LIFE,
INC.; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN
VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION
PROGRAM
ACTION FILED: March 10, 2014
JUDGE: Hon. Morrison C. England
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM
CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
STIPULATION
Plaintiffs and Defendant AT&T Digital Life, Inc. (“AT&T”) (collectively with Plaintiffs, the
“Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, this Court entered a Minute Order referring this matter to the
Court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (Dkt. 109);
WHEREAS, the Parties are currently engaged in informal settlement discussions and wish to
postpone their participation in the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program at this time;
WHEREAS, the Parties agree to report to the Court regarding the status of the matter and
settlement discussions within approximately three months;
10
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that:
11
1.
12
13
The matter’s referral to the Court’s Voluntary Resolution Program is postponed
pending the Parties’ informal settlement discussions; and
2.
The Parties will file a Joint Status Report on or before November 26, 2018 regarding
14
the status of settlement discussions and indicating whether they agree to participate in the Voluntary
15
Dispute Resolution Program at that time.
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
17
18
Dated: August 24, 2017
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
19
By:
20
21
/s/ Katherine V.A. Smith
Katherine V.A. Smith
Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Digital Life, Inc.
22
23
24
25
Dated: August 24, 2017
ROSE LAW, A PROF. CORP.
By:
/s/ Joseph W. Rose
Joseph W. Rose
26
27
Attorneys for Plaintiff
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
2
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM
CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD
1
ORDER
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Pursuant to this Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
that:
1.
The matter’s referral to the Court’s Voluntary Resolution Program is postponed; and
2.
The Parties shall file a Joint Status Report on or before November 26, 2018, regarding
the status of settlement discussions. If the matter has not been settled, the Parties will indicate at that
time whether they agree to participate in the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 28, 2018
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
3
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM
CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?