Gutierrez, et al. v. Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC, et al.

Filing 111

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/28/18 ORDERING that The matter's referral to the Court's Voluntary Resolution Program is postponed; and The Parties shall file a Joint Status Report on or before 11/26/2018, regarding the status of settlement discussions. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JESSE A. CRIPPS, SBN 222285 jcripps@gibsondunn.com KATHERINE V.A. SMITH, SBN 247866 ksmith@gibsondunn.com ASHLEY ALLYN, SBN 254559 aallyn@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 JOSEPH W. ROSE, SBN 232261 joe@joeroselaw.com MEHRAN TAHOORI, SBN 283313 mehran@joeroselaw.com ROSE LAW, A PROF. CORP. 11335 Gold Express Drive, Suite 135 Gold River, California 95670 Telephone: (916) 273-1260 Facsimile: (916) 290-0148 Attorneys for Defendant AT&T DIGITAL LIFE, INC. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 RAMSES GUTIERREZ, et. al. individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 v. CARTER BROTHERS SECURITY SERVICES, LLC., AT&T DIGITAL LIFE, INC.; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM ACTION FILED: March 10, 2014 JUDGE: Hon. Morrison C. England Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 STIPULATION Plaintiffs and Defendant AT&T Digital Life, Inc. (“AT&T”) (collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, this Court entered a Minute Order referring this matter to the Court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (Dkt. 109); WHEREAS, the Parties are currently engaged in informal settlement discussions and wish to postpone their participation in the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program at this time; WHEREAS, the Parties agree to report to the Court regarding the status of the matter and settlement discussions within approximately three months; 10 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that: 11 1. 12 13 The matter’s referral to the Court’s Voluntary Resolution Program is postponed pending the Parties’ informal settlement discussions; and 2. The Parties will file a Joint Status Report on or before November 26, 2018 regarding 14 the status of settlement discussions and indicating whether they agree to participate in the Voluntary 15 Dispute Resolution Program at that time. 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 18 Dated: August 24, 2017 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 19 By: 20 21 /s/ Katherine V.A. Smith Katherine V.A. Smith Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Digital Life, Inc. 22 23 24 25 Dated: August 24, 2017 ROSE LAW, A PROF. CORP. By: /s/ Joseph W. Rose Joseph W. Rose 26 27 Attorneys for Plaintiff 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Pursuant to this Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The matter’s referral to the Court’s Voluntary Resolution Program is postponed; and 2. The Parties shall file a Joint Status Report on or before November 26, 2018, regarding the status of settlement discussions. If the matter has not been settled, the Parties will indicate at that time whether they agree to participate in the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 28, 2018 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 3 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?