Gutierrez, et al. v. Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC, et al.

Filing 96

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/16/2017 ORDERING the Scheduling Order is amended to vacate the Parties' deadline to meet and confer regarding initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26 (f) and all rel ated deadlines; and Not later than ten (10) days following the date an order is electronically filed resolving Gordon & Rees' Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, the parties are directed to file a joint status report regarding the issuance of an Amended Scheduling Order. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

JESSE A. CRIPPS, SBN 222285
[e-mail]
KATHERINE V.A. SMITH, SBN 247866
[e-mail]
ASHLEY ALLYN, SBN 254559
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520

JOSEPH W. ROSE, SBN 232261
[e-mail]
MEHRAN TAHOORI, SBN 283313
[e-mail]
ROSE LAW, A PROF. CORP.
11335 Gold Express Drive, Suite 135
Gold River, California 95670
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Defendant
AT&T DIGITAL LIFE, INC.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15

RAMSES GUTIERREZ, et. al. individually,
and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

16

Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20
21

v.
CARTER BROTHERS SECURITY
SERVICES, LLC., AT&T DIGITAL LIFE,
INC.; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
ACTION FILED: March 10, 2014
JUDGE: Hon. Morrison C. England

Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD

1
2
3
4
5
6

STIPULATION
Plaintiffs and Defendant AT&T Digital Life, Inc. (“AT&T”) (collectively with Plaintiffs, the
“Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on April 13, 2017, this Court entered an Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order
(“Scheduling Order”) (Dkt. 82);
WHEREAS, according to the terms of the Scheduling Order, the Parties must meet and confer

7

as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) regarding their discovery plan by June 12, 2017

8

(Dkt. 82);

9
10

WHEREAS, the Parties must serve their initial disclosures at or within 14 days after their
Rule 26(f) conference as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(C);

11

WHEREAS, on May 2, 2017, Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani (“Gordon & Rees”),

12

counsel for Defendant Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC (“Carter Brothers”) filed a Motion for

13

Withdrawal of Counsel (Dkt. 88), which is pending;

14

WHEREAS, good cause exists to grant relief from the deadlines imposed by the Scheduling

15

Order because the Parties are currently unable to meet and confer with Carter Brothers regarding

16

discovery issues;

17

WHEREAS, extending the time to provide initial disclosures and meet and confer regarding

18

the Parties’ discovery plan pending the resolution of Gordon & Rees’ Motion to Withdraw as

19

Counsel and potential new representation of Carter Brothers will conserve the resources of the Court

20

and avoid prejudice to the Parties.

21

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that:

22

1.

23
24

The Scheduling Order should be amended to vacate the Parties’ deadline to meet and

confer regarding initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(f) and all related deadlines; and
2.

The Court should issue a new Scheduling Order following the resolution of Gordon &

25

Rees’ Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and/or the filing of a notice of appearance of new counsel for

26

Carter Brothers.

27

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

2
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD

1

Dated: June 5, 2017

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

2
By:

3
4
5

/s/ Katherine V.A. Smith
Katherine V.A. Smith

Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Digital Life, Inc.
Dated: June 5, 2017

ROSE LAW, A PROF. CORP.

6
7

By:

/s/ Joseph W. Rose
Joseph W. Rose

8
9

Attorneys for Plaintiff

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

3
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD

1
ORDER

2
3
4
5
6
7

Pursuant to this Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
that:
1.

The Scheduling Order is amended to vacate the Parties’ deadline to meet and confer

regarding initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(f) and all related deadlines; and
2.

Not later than ten (10) days following the date an order is electronically filed resolving

8

Gordon & Rees’ Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, the parties are directed to file a joint status report

9

regarding the issuance of an Amended Scheduling Order.

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 16, 2017

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

4
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD