Gutierrez, et al. v. Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC, et al.

Filing 96

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/16/2017 ORDERING the Scheduling Order is amended to vacate the Parties' deadline to meet and confer regarding initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26 (f) and all rel ated deadlines; and Not later than ten (10) days following the date an order is electronically filed resolving Gordon & Rees' Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, the parties are directed to file a joint status report regarding the issuance of an Amended Scheduling Order. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JESSE A. CRIPPS, SBN 222285 jcripps@gibsondunn.com KATHERINE V.A. SMITH, SBN 247866 ksmith@gibsondunn.com ASHLEY ALLYN, SBN 254559 aallyn@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 JOSEPH W. ROSE, SBN 232261 joe@joeroselaw.com MEHRAN TAHOORI, SBN 283313 mehran@joeroselaw.com ROSE LAW, A PROF. CORP. 11335 Gold Express Drive, Suite 135 Gold River, California 95670 Telephone: (916) 273-1260 Facsimile: (916) 290-0148 Attorneys for Defendant AT&T DIGITAL LIFE, INC. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 RAMSES GUTIERREZ, et. al. individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 v. CARTER BROTHERS SECURITY SERVICES, LLC., AT&T DIGITAL LIFE, INC.; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER ACTION FILED: March 10, 2014 JUDGE: Hon. Morrison C. England Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD 1 2 3 4 5 6 STIPULATION Plaintiffs and Defendant AT&T Digital Life, Inc. (“AT&T”) (collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on April 13, 2017, this Court entered an Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order (“Scheduling Order”) (Dkt. 82); WHEREAS, according to the terms of the Scheduling Order, the Parties must meet and confer 7 as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) regarding their discovery plan by June 12, 2017 8 (Dkt. 82); 9 10 WHEREAS, the Parties must serve their initial disclosures at or within 14 days after their Rule 26(f) conference as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(C); 11 WHEREAS, on May 2, 2017, Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani (“Gordon & Rees”), 12 counsel for Defendant Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC (“Carter Brothers”) filed a Motion for 13 Withdrawal of Counsel (Dkt. 88), which is pending; 14 WHEREAS, good cause exists to grant relief from the deadlines imposed by the Scheduling 15 Order because the Parties are currently unable to meet and confer with Carter Brothers regarding 16 discovery issues; 17 WHEREAS, extending the time to provide initial disclosures and meet and confer regarding 18 the Parties’ discovery plan pending the resolution of Gordon & Rees’ Motion to Withdraw as 19 Counsel and potential new representation of Carter Brothers will conserve the resources of the Court 20 and avoid prejudice to the Parties. 21 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that: 22 1. 23 24 The Scheduling Order should be amended to vacate the Parties’ deadline to meet and confer regarding initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(f) and all related deadlines; and 2. The Court should issue a new Scheduling Order following the resolution of Gordon & 25 Rees’ Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and/or the filing of a notice of appearance of new counsel for 26 Carter Brothers. 27 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD 1 Dated: June 5, 2017 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 2 By: 3 4 5 /s/ Katherine V.A. Smith Katherine V.A. Smith Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Digital Life, Inc. Dated: June 5, 2017 ROSE LAW, A PROF. CORP. 6 7 By: /s/ Joseph W. Rose Joseph W. Rose 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 7 Pursuant to this Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Scheduling Order is amended to vacate the Parties’ deadline to meet and confer regarding initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(f) and all related deadlines; and 2. Not later than ten (10) days following the date an order is electronically filed resolving 8 Gordon & Rees’ Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, the parties are directed to file a joint status report 9 regarding the issuance of an Amended Scheduling Order. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 16, 2017 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NO. 14-CV-00351-MCE-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?