Khadzhimurad v. Sacramento County Sheriff Department

Filing 17

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/6/2015 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BABATOV KHADZHIMURAD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-0385 JAM KJN P v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. 16 17 By an order filed November 4, 2014, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to 18 the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That 19 thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 20 21 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 22 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 25 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 26 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 2 Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: January 6, 2015 4 5 6 /khad0385.fusm 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?