Quinn v. Warren et al
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/28/17 ordering that this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL M. QUINN,
12
No. 2:14-cv-0408 AC P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
WARREN et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge for
19
all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 305(a). ECF No. 4.
By order filed December 29, 2016, the court found that service was appropriate for
20
21
defendants Warren, Nelson, Hernandez, and Steed and directed plaintiff to complete and return
22
the paperwork necessary to effect service on the defendants. ECF No. 19. On February 9, 2016,
23
after plaintiff failed to return the required paperwork, the court again ordered plaintiff to complete
24
and return the paperwork to effect service on the defendants and gave him an additional thirty
25
days to do so. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff was warned that failure to return the required paperwork
26
would result in dismissal of his case. Id. Thirty days have now passed and plaintiff has not
27
returned the required documents or otherwise responded to the orders.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice for
2
failure to prosecute.
3
DATED: March 28, 2017
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?