Quinn v. Warren et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/28/17 ordering that this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL M. QUINN, 12 No. 2:14-cv-0408 AC P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 WARREN et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge for 19 all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 305(a). ECF No. 4. By order filed December 29, 2016, the court found that service was appropriate for 20 21 defendants Warren, Nelson, Hernandez, and Steed and directed plaintiff to complete and return 22 the paperwork necessary to effect service on the defendants. ECF No. 19. On February 9, 2016, 23 after plaintiff failed to return the required paperwork, the court again ordered plaintiff to complete 24 and return the paperwork to effect service on the defendants and gave him an additional thirty 25 days to do so. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff was warned that failure to return the required paperwork 26 would result in dismissal of his case. Id. Thirty days have now passed and plaintiff has not 27 returned the required documents or otherwise responded to the orders. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice for 2 failure to prosecute. 3 DATED: March 28, 2017 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?