Joseph v. Parciasepe, et al.

Filing 77

ORDER adopting in full 76 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 11/15/17. Plaintiff's 74 motion to rescind the settlement is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALONZO JAMES JOSEPH, 8 9 10 No. 2:14-cv-0414 GEB AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. PARCIASEPE, 11 Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 14 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 15 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 16 On September 27, 2017, Magistrate Judge Kendall Newman filed findings and 17 recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all 18 parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen 19 days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 20 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 21 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 22 ORDERED that: 23 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 27, 2017, are adopted in full; and 24 2. Plaintiff’s motion to rescind the settlement (ECF No. 74) is denied. 25 Dated: November 15, 2017 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?