Joseph v. Parciasepe, et al.

Filing 77

ORDER adopting in full 76 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 11/15/17. Plaintiff's 74 motion to rescind the settlement is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ALONZO JAMES JOSEPH,

8
9
10

No. 2:14-cv-0414 GEB AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

T. PARCIASEPE,

11

Defendant.

12
13

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

14

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

15

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

16

On September 27, 2017, Magistrate Judge Kendall Newman filed findings and

17

recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all

18

parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen

19

days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

20

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

21

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

22

ORDERED that:

23

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 27, 2017, are adopted in full; and

24

2. Plaintiff’s motion to rescind the settlement (ECF No. 74) is denied.

25

Dated: November 15, 2017

26
27
28
1