Banks, Sr. v. Regents of the University of California, et al.

Filing 9

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/28/14 RECOMMENDING that defendants University of California Regents and University of California Davis Medical Center be dismissed. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YUJUAN BANKS, SR., 12 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-0460 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS U.C. REGENTS, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The undersigned has separately issued an order addressing the complaint 19 filed February 12, 2014. In this order, the undersigned found that plaintiff’s claims against 20 defendants University of California Regents and University of California Davis Medical Center 21 are barred by the Eleventh Amendment. For the reasons stated in that order, the undersigned now 22 recommends dismissal of these defendants. 23 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants University of California Regents and University of California Davis Medical Center be dismissed. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 1 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 2 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 3 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: February 28, 2014 5 6 Ba460.56 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?