Banks, Sr. v. Regents of the University of California, et al.
Filing
9
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/28/14 RECOMMENDING that defendants University of California Regents and University of California Davis Medical Center be dismissed. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
YUJUAN BANKS, SR.,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-0460 TLN KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
U.C. REGENTS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The undersigned has separately issued an order addressing the complaint
19
filed February 12, 2014. In this order, the undersigned found that plaintiff’s claims against
20
defendants University of California Regents and University of California Davis Medical Center
21
are barred by the Eleventh Amendment. For the reasons stated in that order, the undersigned now
22
recommends dismissal of these defendants.
23
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants University of California
Regents and University of California Davis Medical Center be dismissed.
25
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
26
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
27
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
28
with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
1
1
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that
2
failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
3
Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
4
Dated: February 28, 2014
5
6
Ba460.56
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?