Riley v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 45

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/08/15 DISCHARGING 42 Order to Show Cause and SETTING Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/6/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Plaintiff may appear telephonically. Scheduling report due by 04/22/15. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MALACHI ANTHONY RILEY, 12 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-00462-KJM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This case is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendants 18 removed this matter from Sacramento Superior Court on February 12, 2014. ECF No. 1. On 19 August 11, 2014, defendants filed a notice of settlement that stated dispositional documents 20 would be filed within forty-five (45) days. ECF No. 20. However, on September 26, 2014, 21 plaintiff’s attorney filed a motion to withdraw. ECF No. 23. The court granted that motion on 22 January 6, 2015. ECF No. 37. On January 30, 2015, plaintiff (now proceeding in pro per) filed a 23 letter claiming that his former attorney had entered into the foregoing settlement agreement 24 without plaintiff’s consent. ECF No. 38. Although plaintiff states that he has no objections to his 25 former attorney’s withdrawal, he denies that he has ever released defendants from liability for his 26 claims. Id. 27 28 On February 5, 2015, the undersigned set an initial scheduling conference for March 11, 2015. ECF No. 39. On March 3, 2015, defendants filed a status report claiming that they mailed 1 1 a copy to plaintiff requesting that he either (1) sign and return the report if he approved of it; or 2 (2) contact counsel’s office if he had questions or wanted to make changes. ECF No. 40 at 2. 3 Plaintiff never responded to defendants’ letter, despite being informed of the filing deadline for 4 status reports. Id. In addition, plaintiff failed to appear at the court’s hearing on March 11, 2015. 5 On March 12, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause within 14 days why his action 6 should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 42. 7 On April 6, 2015, plaintiff filed a response claiming that he did not receive the court’s 8 order setting the March 11, 2015, scheduling conference, and had only recently received its order 9 to show cause. ECF No. 43. According to plaintiff, he did not receive the court’s orders because 10 he was out of town due to a family emergency. Id. In addition, plaintiff asks to be excused from 11 future court appearances as he is unemployed and does not have the funds to travel to 12 Sacramento. Id. 13 The court finds that plaintiff has established good cause and accordingly will discharge its 14 order to show cause and set a new scheduling conference. This matter will be set for an initial 15 scheduling conference on May 6, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 26 before the undersigned. 16 Plaintiff must appear, but may do so telephonically. Plaintiff is instructed to contact the 17 courtroom deputy, Valerie Callen, (916) 930-4199 no later than 48 hours prior to the hearing and 18 advise the court of the telephone number at which he can be reached for the scheduling 19 conference. Defendants need not file a scheduling report, as they have already done so. 20 However, if plaintiff would like to add his own explanation of his position in this matter or 21 suggest dates for the court’s scheduling order he may file his own scheduling report no later than 22 April 22, 2015. 23 In accordance with the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. The court’s March 12, 2015, order to show cause, ECF No. 42, is discharged; and 25 2. This matter is set for an initial scheduling conference on May 6, 2015, at 10:00 26 a.m. in Courtroom 26 before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Plaintiff may appear 27 //// 28 //// 2 1 telephonically. Plaintiff must file his scheduling report, if any, on or before April 22, 2015. 2 DATED: April 8, 2015 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?