Lee v. Grounds

Filing 22

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/27/14 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GEORGE LEE,

12
13
14
15

No. 2: 14-cv-0464 TLN KJN P
Plaintiff,

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

R. GROUNDS, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On July 18, 2014, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to complete and submit 3

18

completed USM-285 forms. (ECF No. 19.) The July 18, 2014 order stated that following receipt

19

of these forms, the court would order service of defendants Garay, Sturcho and Ashley with the

20

second amended complaint. (Id.)

21

Thirty days passed and plaintiff did not submit the 3 completed USM-285 forms.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

23
24

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

27

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and

28

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
1

1

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

2

Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: August 27, 2014

4
5

Lee464.fusm

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2