Jones v. Kern Valley State Prison

Filing 60

ORDER ADOPTING 58 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/19/17: Plaintiff's petition is dismissed without leave to amend. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case. A Certificate of Appealability shall issue for Claim 3 of the petition only. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY JONES, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-00486-JAM-GGH v. ORDER KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON,, 15 Respondent. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this federal habeas corpus matter. 17 18 On November 15, 2017 the magistrate issued Findings and Recommendations that the one 19 remaining claim on plaintiff’s Petition, Claim No. 3, should be denied, and gave the parties 20 twenty-one (21) days to file objections. ECF No. 58. Petitioner filed his objections on December 21 8, 2017. ECF No. 59. 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, 22 23 this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, and the 24 magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, the court ADOPTS the findings and 25 recommendations and will grant defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is some respects and deny it in 26 others. 27 28 1 All other claims were earlier denied but judgment was withheld until Claim 3 was dealt with. See ECF No. 47. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s petition is dismissed without leave to amend; 3 2. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case; 4 3. A Certificate of Appealability shall issue for Claim 3 of the petition only. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: 12/19/2017 7 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?