Golden v. Sound Inpatient Physicians Medical Group, Inc. et al

Filing 43

THIRD STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/24/14 GRANTING 42 to Continue Rule 26 Disclosure Deadline. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OTASHE GOLDEN, M.D., 12 Case No. 2:14-CV-00497-TLN-EFB Plaintiffs, Assigned to Honorable Judge: Troy L. Nunley 13 v. 14 SOUND INPATIENT PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, INC.; DAMERON HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, a California Non-Profit Association; NICHOLAS ARISMENDI; an individual and DOES 110, inclusive. 15 16 17 ORDER GRANTING THIRD JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RULE 26 DISCLOSURE DEADLINE [Filed concurrently with Stipulation] Complaint Filed: February 18, 2014 Defendants. 18 19 20 ORDER 21 22 The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation Extending the Rule 26 23 Disclosure Deadline, finds good cause to grant the request for extension, and orders as 24 follows: 25 Plaintiff Otashe Golden, M.D. and defendant Sound Inpatient Physicians Medical 26 Group, Inc.’s time for filing the Rule 26 Discovery Plan, shall be briefly extended to 27 November 21, 2014 and the deadline for Rule 26 Disclosures shall be December 19, 2014. 28 /// K UTAK R OCK LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW IRVINE 4833-2121-8078.1 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CASE NO. 14-CV-00497-LKK-EFB 1 HEREBY ORDERED: 2 3 Dated: September 24, 2014 4 5 6 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 Respectfully submitted: KUTAK ROCK LLP 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 By: /s/ Matthew C. Sgnilek Marcia A. Washkuhn, pro hac vice Matthew C. Sgnilek (SBN 235299) 5 Park Plaza, Suite 1500 Irvine, California 92614-8595 Telephone: (949) 417-0999 Facsimile: (949) 417-5394 Attorneys for Defendant SOUND INPATIENT PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, INC. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 K UTAK R OCK LLP -2- ATTO RNEY S AT LAW IRVINE 4833-2121-8078.1 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00497-TLN-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?