Golden v. Sound Inpatient Physicians Medical Group, Inc. et al
Filing
43
THIRD STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/24/14 GRANTING 42 to Continue Rule 26 Disclosure Deadline. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
OTASHE GOLDEN, M.D.,
12
Case No. 2:14-CV-00497-TLN-EFB
Plaintiffs,
Assigned to Honorable Judge:
Troy L. Nunley
13
v.
14
SOUND INPATIENT PHYSICIANS
MEDICAL GROUP, INC.; DAMERON
HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, a California
Non-Profit Association; NICHOLAS
ARISMENDI; an individual and DOES 110, inclusive.
15
16
17
ORDER GRANTING THIRD
JOINT STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE RULE 26
DISCLOSURE DEADLINE
[Filed concurrently with Stipulation]
Complaint Filed: February 18, 2014
Defendants.
18
19
20
ORDER
21
22
The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation Extending the Rule 26
23
Disclosure Deadline, finds good cause to grant the request for extension, and orders as
24
follows:
25
Plaintiff Otashe Golden, M.D. and defendant Sound Inpatient Physicians Medical
26
Group, Inc.’s time for filing the Rule 26 Discovery Plan, shall be briefly extended to
27
November 21, 2014 and the deadline for Rule 26 Disclosures shall be December 19, 2014.
28
///
K UTAK R OCK LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
IRVINE
4833-2121-8078.1
ORDER
GRANTING STIPULATION
CASE NO. 14-CV-00497-LKK-EFB
1
HEREBY ORDERED:
2
3
Dated: September 24, 2014
4
5
6
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
Respectfully submitted:
KUTAK ROCK LLP
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
By: /s/ Matthew C. Sgnilek
Marcia A. Washkuhn, pro hac vice
Matthew C. Sgnilek (SBN 235299)
5 Park Plaza, Suite 1500
Irvine, California 92614-8595
Telephone:
(949) 417-0999
Facsimile:
(949) 417-5394
Attorneys for Defendant
SOUND INPATIENT PHYSICIANS
MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
K UTAK R OCK LLP
-2-
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
IRVINE
4833-2121-8078.1
ORDER
GRANTING STIPULATION
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00497-TLN-EFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?